Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27531 - 27540 of 30070 for de.

[PDF] NOTICE
No. 2010AP466-FT 9 reviews contentions of erroneous [exercise of] judicial discretion de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54057 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
)(a). Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo.� See State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28306 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 43
is available to him is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Pozo, 2002 WI App 279, ¶6, 258 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109387 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Richard J. Krueger
are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21495 - 2006-02-23

COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶26 If we conclude the defendant has not proved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83298 - 2012-06-06

[PDF] WI APP 8
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wis., Inc., 2009 WI 74, ¶36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131917 - 2017-09-21

Sinora Glenn v. Michael T. Plante, M.D.
is a question of law, which we review de novo. Alt, 224 Wis. 2d at 84. See also Vultaggio v. Yasko, 215 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16630 - 2005-03-31

State v. Antoine D. Edwards
facts that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21736 - 2006-03-13

State v. Richard A. Dodson
question that this court reviews de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶5, 237 Wis. 2d 709, 616 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4941 - 2005-03-31

City of Milwaukee v. Michelle M. Burnette
judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2955 - 2005-03-31