Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27541 - 27550 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 27541 - 27550 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Dennis Demarce v. Francis E. Diesing
of Diesing's death. We reject this argument and affirm the trial court's denial of his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14591 - 2005-03-31
of Diesing's death. We reject this argument and affirm the trial court's denial of his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14591 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dennis Demarce v. Francis E. Diesing
the trial court's denial of his motion to dismiss. Diesing further argues that the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14591 - 2017-09-21
the trial court's denial of his motion to dismiss. Diesing further argues that the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14591 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in 1995. The issues on appeal involve whether the Shielys had standing to bring the motion for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213609 - 2018-05-30
in 1995. The issues on appeal involve whether the Shielys had standing to bring the motion for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213609 - 2018-05-30
Williams Corner Investors, LLC v. Areawide Cellular, LLC
to Williams Corner Investors, LLC, (Williams). Williams’ motion for a default judgment was granted after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6321 - 2005-03-31
to Williams Corner Investors, LLC, (Williams). Williams’ motion for a default judgment was granted after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6321 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
her motion to suppress evidence because, she asserts, the arresting officer did not have the requisite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35984 - 2009-03-25
her motion to suppress evidence because, she asserts, the arresting officer did not have the requisite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35984 - 2009-03-25
[PDF]
Gary Tate v. David H. Schwarz
, and a motion for postconviction relief on June 25, 1999. 2 On February 16, 1999, Tate began sex offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2709 - 2017-09-19
, and a motion for postconviction relief on June 25, 1999. 2 On February 16, 1999, Tate began sex offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2709 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
it was not until the postconviction motion hearing that the court first informed the parties that it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=373047 - 2021-06-03
it was not until the postconviction motion hearing that the court first informed the parties that it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=373047 - 2021-06-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motions for reconsideration. This appeal arises from the denial of Berard’s motion to reconsider his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76973 - 2014-09-15
motions for reconsideration. This appeal arises from the denial of Berard’s motion to reconsider his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76973 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
after reviewing the discovery in this matter.” ¶6 In February 2023, Susan filed a “motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901112 - 2025-01-14
after reviewing the discovery in this matter.” ¶6 In February 2023, Susan filed a “motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901112 - 2025-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying her motion for postconviction relief.[2] We affirm. Background ¶2 After a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125500 - 2014-11-03
an order denying her motion for postconviction relief.[2] We affirm. Background ¶2 After a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125500 - 2014-11-03