Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27541 - 27550 of 30059 for de.
Search results 27541 - 27550 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
Jerome Hoepker v. City of Madison Plan Commission
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Lake City Corp. v. City of Mequon, 207 Wis. 2d 156, 162-63
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17039 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Lake City Corp. v. City of Mequon, 207 Wis. 2d 156, 162-63
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17039 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 57
. The Court reasoned it “ma[de] sense for Congress to have classified as a ‘misdemeanor crime of domestic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143097 - 2017-09-21
. The Court reasoned it “ma[de] sense for Congress to have classified as a ‘misdemeanor crime of domestic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143097 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
., 55 Wis. 2d 27, 33, 197 N.W.2d 783 (1972) (citations omitted). ¶14 We review de novo the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60123 - 2011-02-16
., 55 Wis. 2d 27, 33, 197 N.W.2d 783 (1972) (citations omitted). ¶14 We review de novo the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60123 - 2011-02-16
Forest County v. Wesley S. Goode
meaning of the statute. The construction of a statute or ordinance is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11844 - 2005-03-31
meaning of the statute. The construction of a statute or ordinance is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11844 - 2005-03-31
Robert M. v. City of Franklin
.2d 825, 827 (Ct. App. 1989). Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2619 - 2006-12-12
.2d 825, 827 (Ct. App. 1989). Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2619 - 2006-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
to grant a defendant’s motion to dismiss for insufficient evidence at the close of plaintiff’s case on a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35199 - 2009-01-12
to grant a defendant’s motion to dismiss for insufficient evidence at the close of plaintiff’s case on a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35199 - 2009-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
a preliminary evidentiary showing sufficient for an in camera review is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79065 - 2012-03-18
a preliminary evidentiary showing sufficient for an in camera review is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79065 - 2012-03-18
COURT OF APPEALS
, which we review de novo. State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43, 717 N.W.2d 676. ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115434 - 2014-06-25
, which we review de novo. State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43, 717 N.W.2d 676. ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115434 - 2014-06-25
[PDF]
State v. Sammy Gates
at 451. This question is one of law which this court reviews de novo without deference to the lower
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13718 - 2014-09-15
at 451. This question is one of law which this court reviews de novo without deference to the lower
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13718 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. J.W.J., 375 Wis. 2d 542, ¶15; Melanie L., 349 Wis. 2d 148, ¶¶38-39. B. Substantive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364121 - 2021-05-06
de novo. J.W.J., 375 Wis. 2d 542, ¶15; Melanie L., 349 Wis. 2d 148, ¶¶38-39. B. Substantive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364121 - 2021-05-06