Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27551 - 27560 of 42902 for WA 0859 3970 0884 Total Biaya Untuk Membangun Taman Rumah Minimalis Type 36 Getasan Kab Semarang.

State v. Terry L. Robertson
great that it likely resulted in a total lack of communication that prevented an adequate defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2309 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a total of 468 days of credit—comprised of the original 247 days awarded by the sentencing court, plus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757062 - 2024-01-30

[PDF] State v. Daniel J. Phillips
criminal behavior. In truth, Terry stands for a totally different proposition. A close reading shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4727 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
of protection or services and placed outside the home for a cumulative total period of six months or longer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117662 - 2014-07-21

[PDF] Dane County Department of Human Services v. Teresita J.
. (c) That the child has been outside the home for a cumulative total period of one year or longer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12197 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and decided under a totality of the circumstances, weighing the suspect’s personal characteristics against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731238 - 2023-11-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the totality of the circumstances, the investigatory stop was reasonable because of the following objective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140075 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Appeal No. 2009AP1209-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2006CF747
Department where he [weighed] it and conducted a field test for cocaine. The total gross weight was 64.9
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52584 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
asserts, under the totality of the circumstances, the investigatory stop was reasonable because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140075 - 2015-04-20

State v. Kevin S. Schatzke
is “in custody” for purposes of Miranda protection we consider the totality of the circumstances, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4811 - 2005-03-31