Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27551 - 27560 of 30059 for de.
Search results 27551 - 27560 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation, for the sake of this particular argument we apply a de novo standard of review. See Seider v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894720 - 2024-12-26
interpretation, for the sake of this particular argument we apply a de novo standard of review. See Seider v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894720 - 2024-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
concluded on de novo review that the court’s interpretation of the lease was correct, we reject McCune’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000714 - 2025-08-26
concluded on de novo review that the court’s interpretation of the lease was correct, we reject McCune’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000714 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the deficient performance prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶¶38-39
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887928 - 2024-12-10
the deficient performance prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶¶38-39
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887928 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
WI App 69
, not potentially hazardous, homemade foods.8 We review WCFA’s challenge de novo. Blake v. Jossart, 2016 WI 57
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878326 - 2025-01-24
, not potentially hazardous, homemade foods.8 We review WCFA’s challenge de novo. Blake v. Jossart, 2016 WI 57
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878326 - 2025-01-24
COURT OF APPEALS
., 55 Wis. 2d 27, 33, 197 N.W.2d 783 (1972) (citations omitted). ¶14 We review de novo the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60123 - 2011-02-16
., 55 Wis. 2d 27, 33, 197 N.W.2d 783 (1972) (citations omitted). ¶14 We review de novo the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60123 - 2011-02-16
Forest County v. Wesley S. Goode
meaning of the statute. The construction of a statute or ordinance is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11844 - 2005-03-31
meaning of the statute. The construction of a statute or ordinance is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11844 - 2005-03-31
Robert M. v. City of Franklin
.2d 825, 827 (Ct. App. 1989). Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2619 - 2006-12-12
.2d 825, 827 (Ct. App. 1989). Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2619 - 2006-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
to grant a defendant’s motion to dismiss for insufficient evidence at the close of plaintiff’s case on a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35199 - 2009-01-12
to grant a defendant’s motion to dismiss for insufficient evidence at the close of plaintiff’s case on a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35199 - 2009-01-12
State v. Richard A. Dodson
question that this court reviews de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶5, 237 Wis. 2d 709, 616 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4941 - 2010-07-01
question that this court reviews de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶5, 237 Wis. 2d 709, 616 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4941 - 2010-07-01
COURT OF APPEALS
a preliminary evidentiary showing sufficient for an in camera review is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79065 - 2012-03-18
a preliminary evidentiary showing sufficient for an in camera review is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79065 - 2012-03-18