Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27551 - 27560 of 46126 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 27551 - 27560 of 46126 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Francis E. Altman
The prejudice prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where the attorney’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26043 - 2006-07-31
The prejudice prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where the attorney’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26043 - 2006-07-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael Crawford
(1973) (citations omitted). Further, “[i]n testing the complaint, both facts and the reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11406 - 2017-09-19
(1973) (citations omitted). Further, “[i]n testing the complaint, both facts and the reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11406 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Armando T. Trevino, Jr.
. However, this is not the test. The test is whether the trial court relied upon any of this allegedly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11819 - 2017-09-21
. However, this is not the test. The test is whether the trial court relied upon any of this allegedly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11819 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy M. F.
conclude that it was harmless. The test for harmless error is whether there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7264 - 2017-09-20
conclude that it was harmless. The test for harmless error is whether there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7264 - 2017-09-20
State v. Jeffrey P. Williamson
assistance of counsel requires the application of the two-part test established in Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2731 - 2005-03-31
assistance of counsel requires the application of the two-part test established in Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2731 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. “The evidentiary test on certiorari review is the substantial evidence test, under which we determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72493 - 2011-10-19
. “The evidentiary test on certiorari review is the substantial evidence test, under which we determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72493 - 2011-10-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the “two-prong test” stated in Hintz merely because he was in custody since his arrest on December 26
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662117 - 2023-05-31
the “two-prong test” stated in Hintz merely because he was in custody since his arrest on December 26
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662117 - 2023-05-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
counsel’s performance, if true, would rise to the level of ineffective assistance. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34770 - 2014-09-15
counsel’s performance, if true, would rise to the level of ineffective assistance. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34770 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Proegler submitted to a breathalyzer test, which revealed a prohibited blood alcohol content. Id. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35805 - 2009-03-10
. Proegler submitted to a breathalyzer test, which revealed a prohibited blood alcohol content. Id. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35805 - 2009-03-10
State v. Norman D. Stapleton
prongs of the test, and a reviewing court need not address both prongs if the defendant fails to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2597 - 2005-03-31
prongs of the test, and a reviewing court need not address both prongs if the defendant fails to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2597 - 2005-03-31