Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27551 - 27560 of 63559 for records.
Search results 27551 - 27560 of 63559 for records.
State v. Francisco Guerrido
of record. Where the trial court fails to adequately explain the reasons for its decision, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8860 - 2005-03-31
of record. Where the trial court fails to adequately explain the reasons for its decision, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8860 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nathan Speers
enforcement drug interdiction effort. The record of the suppression hearing does not bear out Speers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17730 - 2017-09-21
enforcement drug interdiction effort. The record of the suppression hearing does not bear out Speers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17730 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
harassment of the petitioners, including pointing surveillance cameras at the petitioners' house to record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214322 - 2018-06-15
harassment of the petitioners, including pointing surveillance cameras at the petitioners' house to record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214322 - 2018-06-15
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel Whaley
that an evidentiary hearing is necessary because the record is incomplete regarding the exact nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10114 - 2017-09-19
that an evidentiary hearing is necessary because the record is incomplete regarding the exact nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10114 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not consider documents that are not included in the record, and we see no indication that this was presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283904 - 2020-09-02
not consider documents that are not included in the record, and we see no indication that this was presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283904 - 2020-09-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
indication of bipolar disorder, but he testified he did not believe Gadzinski’s record was adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113104 - 2017-09-21
indication of bipolar disorder, but he testified he did not believe Gadzinski’s record was adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113104 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously exercised its discretion because it “failed to explain on the record why the DNA surcharge ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95671 - 2013-04-28
erroneously exercised its discretion because it “failed to explain on the record why the DNA surcharge ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95671 - 2013-04-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the movant is not entitled to relief, the circuit court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179029 - 2017-09-21
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the movant is not entitled to relief, the circuit court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179029 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it “did not hear that” and replayed the recording with the court reporter simultaneously transcribing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140750 - 2017-09-21
it “did not hear that” and replayed the recording with the court reporter simultaneously transcribing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140750 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviewed video images from a security camera that had recorded the area of the bathroom and in doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120980 - 2014-09-15
reviewed video images from a security camera that had recorded the area of the bathroom and in doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120980 - 2014-09-15