Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27561 - 27570 of 69908 for his.
Search results 27561 - 27570 of 69908 for his.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Appointed appellate No. 2020AP1428-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352511 - 2021-04-06
appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Appointed appellate No. 2020AP1428-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352511 - 2021-04-06
[PDF]
State v. Jimmy L. Hanson
of armed robbery while concealing his identity, and an order denying postconviction relief. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5757 - 2017-09-19
of armed robbery while concealing his identity, and an order denying postconviction relief. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5757 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals, pro se, the dismissal of his complaint in which he sought to recover damages arising from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187093 - 2017-09-21
appeals, pro se, the dismissal of his complaint in which he sought to recover damages arising from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187093 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of these issues aside from his pleas, and additionally raising new claims related to jurisdiction, purported
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440888 - 2021-10-13
of these issues aside from his pleas, and additionally raising new claims related to jurisdiction, purported
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440888 - 2021-10-13
State v. David Mikel
., and from an order denying his sentence modification motion. Mikel received a ten-year sentence after he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12419 - 2005-03-31
., and from an order denying his sentence modification motion. Mikel received a ten-year sentence after he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12419 - 2005-03-31
Eugene C. Rondon v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
argues: (1) that his conduct was not “willful” under Wis. Stat. § 77.60(9) (2001-02);[1] (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5048 - 2005-03-31
argues: (1) that his conduct was not “willful” under Wis. Stat. § 77.60(9) (2001-02);[1] (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5048 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cleveland R. Barnes
the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5066 - 2005-03-31
the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5066 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Anthony Garrison, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to rescind restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51613 - 2010-07-06
PER CURIAM. Anthony Garrison, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to rescind restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51613 - 2010-07-06
State v. Norman O. Brown
PER CURIAM. Norman Brown appeals from a set of orders denying his postconviction motions for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16050 - 2005-03-31
PER CURIAM. Norman Brown appeals from a set of orders denying his postconviction motions for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16050 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that he did not knowingly, intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100358 - 2013-08-05
an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that he did not knowingly, intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100358 - 2013-08-05