Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27561 - 27570 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 27561 - 27570 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
, P.J.[1] In this termination of parental rights case, the circuit court decided on summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70172 - 2011-08-24
, P.J.[1] In this termination of parental rights case, the circuit court decided on summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70172 - 2011-08-24
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
________________________________________________________________________ ISSUES 1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39804 - 2009-08-17
________________________________________________________________________ ISSUES 1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39804 - 2009-08-17
[PDF]
State v. Joshua G. Storlie
based on her representation of a potential witness in one of these cases. The information regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11125 - 2017-09-19
based on her representation of a potential witness in one of these cases. The information regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11125 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347313 - 2021-03-18
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347313 - 2021-03-18
[PDF]
State v. Tony L. Gadicke
of the defense case, because counsel had forgotten during cross-examination to ask the victim about her prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6316 - 2017-09-19
of the defense case, because counsel had forgotten during cross-examination to ask the victim about her prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6316 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=580260 - 2022-10-26
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=580260 - 2022-10-26
State v. Tony L. Gadicke
to recall the victim to the stand, near the end of the defense case, because counsel had forgotten during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6316 - 2005-03-31
to recall the victim to the stand, near the end of the defense case, because counsel had forgotten during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6316 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. In Outagamie County Circuit Court case No. 2016CF719
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245425 - 2019-08-20
are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. In Outagamie County Circuit Court case No. 2016CF719
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245425 - 2019-08-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2022AP1781 2 appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2022AP1781 2 appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
State v. Kirk Ennenga
pending a period of fifteen years on probation, Judge Bissonnette commented: [A] case like this, I guess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15011 - 2005-03-31
pending a period of fifteen years on probation, Judge Bissonnette commented: [A] case like this, I guess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15011 - 2005-03-31