Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27561 - 27570 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 27561 - 27570 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347313 - 2021-03-18
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347313 - 2021-03-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=580260 - 2022-10-26
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=580260 - 2022-10-26
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred by denying Country’s motion for summary judgment; (2) the court’s “statement of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97786 - 2013-06-03
court erred by denying Country’s motion for summary judgment; (2) the court’s “statement of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97786 - 2013-06-03
[PDF]
State v. Julie Dixon
2 applicable law and failed to consider all the relevant facts in this case, we reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13355 - 2017-09-21
2 applicable law and failed to consider all the relevant facts in this case, we reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13355 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2022AP1781 2 appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2022AP1781 2 appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
Kevin A. Laufer v. Town of Merton
for reconsideration. The court dismissed the action at the conclusion of the Laufers’ case, finding that they had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14080 - 2005-03-31
for reconsideration. The court dismissed the action at the conclusion of the Laufers’ case, finding that they had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14080 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, P.J.[1] In this termination of parental rights case, the circuit court decided on summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70172 - 2011-08-24
, P.J.[1] In this termination of parental rights case, the circuit court decided on summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70172 - 2011-08-24
[PDF]
State v. Tony L. Gadicke
of the defense case, because counsel had forgotten during cross-examination to ask the victim about her prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6316 - 2017-09-19
of the defense case, because counsel had forgotten during cross-examination to ask the victim about her prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6316 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2022AP1781 2 appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2022AP1781 2 appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
State v. Percy Ray Morgan
with the sentence to the intensive sanctions program. The sentence imposed in this case does not violate any part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16071 - 2005-03-31
with the sentence to the intensive sanctions program. The sentence imposed in this case does not violate any part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16071 - 2005-03-31