Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27581 - 27590 of 34031 for dismissal.
Search results 27581 - 27590 of 34031 for dismissal.
COURT OF APPEALS
) and 939.05 (1999-2000). Three additional felonies were dismissed and read in at sentencing. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60748 - 2011-03-07
) and 939.05 (1999-2000). Three additional felonies were dismissed and read in at sentencing. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60748 - 2011-03-07
[PDF]
Pamela Ketelle v. Wausau-Stettin Mutual Insurance Company
of material fact regarding any of Ketelle’s claims against Holster. The court dismissed the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6709 - 2017-09-20
of material fact regarding any of Ketelle’s claims against Holster. The court dismissed the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6709 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Robert E. Mathias v. Ford Credit Corporation
The Mathiases moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal from the March 8, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4121 - 2017-09-20
The Mathiases moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal from the March 8, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4121 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a no-contest plea to the amphetamine charge in this case in exchange for the dismissal of four other drug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262706 - 2020-06-02
a no-contest plea to the amphetamine charge in this case in exchange for the dismissal of four other drug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262706 - 2020-06-02
State v. Christopher L. Nagel
was dismissed. The maximum penalty for a violation of § 346.63(2)(a)1, Stats., is a fine from $300 to $2,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13302 - 2005-03-31
was dismissed. The maximum penalty for a violation of § 346.63(2)(a)1, Stats., is a fine from $300 to $2,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13302 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of movable property, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 943.20(1)(a), in exchange for the dismissal and reading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33621 - 2014-09-15
of movable property, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 943.20(1)(a), in exchange for the dismissal and reading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33621 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and dismissed the motion to modify custody and placement. Kikkert filed a motion for reconsideration, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159365 - 2017-09-21
and dismissed the motion to modify custody and placement. Kikkert filed a motion for reconsideration, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159365 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 2 A charge of false imprisonment was dismissed pursuant to a plea agreement. No. 2006AP1486
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29860 - 2014-09-15
. 2 A charge of false imprisonment was dismissed pursuant to a plea agreement. No. 2006AP1486
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29860 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anthony Lentowski
dismiss and read in all other charges. Additionally, at sentencing the district attorney would “have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11403 - 2005-03-31
dismiss and read in all other charges. Additionally, at sentencing the district attorney would “have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11403 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to dismiss the second ground for termination: failure to assume parental responsibility. The trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266829 - 2020-07-07
to dismiss the second ground for termination: failure to assume parental responsibility. The trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266829 - 2020-07-07