Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27581 - 27590 of 40201 for financial disclosure statements.
Search results 27581 - 27590 of 40201 for financial disclosure statements.
COURT OF APPEALS
by statements of facts rather than by mere conclusions of the witnesses, and a claimant’s mere statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134905 - 2015-02-11
by statements of facts rather than by mere conclusions of the witnesses, and a claimant’s mere statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134905 - 2015-02-11
Helena Coke, M.D. v. Eau Claire Women's Care Service Corporation
was not inaccurate. Further, to the extent Coke argues that Schoenfelder’s statement of her belief is contradicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7457 - 2005-03-31
was not inaccurate. Further, to the extent Coke argues that Schoenfelder’s statement of her belief is contradicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7457 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ricky J. Fortier
attorney made the following statement: “The case was initiated based on a search warrant. The search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20809 - 2006-01-24
attorney made the following statement: “The case was initiated based on a search warrant. The search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20809 - 2006-01-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
6 The court also cited C.S.’s statement that he was not a lawyer, which “[brought] to [the] [c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896652 - 2025-01-02
6 The court also cited C.S.’s statement that he was not a lawyer, which “[brought] to [the] [c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896652 - 2025-01-02
State v. William F. Williams
with the State. He argues that the trial court’s statement that “I have just made a policy” to reject Alford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15307 - 2005-03-31
with the State. He argues that the trial court’s statement that “I have just made a policy” to reject Alford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15307 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of trial counsel. Instead, he alleged that the trial court’s statements led to his confusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215209 - 2018-07-10
assistance of trial counsel. Instead, he alleged that the trial court’s statements led to his confusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215209 - 2018-07-10
[PDF]
WI App 48
. (Emphasis added.) Weigel did not object to the above-emphasized statement. The State then recommended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=549045 - 2022-09-14
. (Emphasis added.) Weigel did not object to the above-emphasized statement. The State then recommended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=549045 - 2022-09-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
has been revoked and reinstated multiple times. On May 25, 2021, the department filed a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641335 - 2023-04-04
has been revoked and reinstated multiple times. On May 25, 2021, the department filed a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641335 - 2023-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and it sheds no light on any issue here. For example, it contains no statement that supports Ambac’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205694 - 2017-12-14
, and it sheds no light on any issue here. For example, it contains no statement that supports Ambac’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205694 - 2017-12-14
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
corrected the trial court’s initial statement of the total maximum sentence at stake before stating he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5565 - 2017-09-19
corrected the trial court’s initial statement of the total maximum sentence at stake before stating he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5565 - 2017-09-19