Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27591 - 27600 of 69145 for he.
Search results 27591 - 27600 of 69145 for he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to suppress the blood draw evidence. He argues that the blood draw evidence was inadmissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154646 - 2017-09-21
motion to suppress the blood draw evidence. He argues that the blood draw evidence was inadmissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154646 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of appeal, Johnson in July 2013 moved to amend the judgment of conviction. He asserted that the State’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453264 - 2021-11-16
of appeal, Johnson in July 2013 moved to amend the judgment of conviction. He asserted that the State’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453264 - 2021-11-16
[PDF]
State v. Ray Lee Wimer
it No. 01-2578 2 does not require a finding that he suffers from a mental disorder that makes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4416 - 2017-09-19
it No. 01-2578 2 does not require a finding that he suffers from a mental disorder that makes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4416 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with a signed plea questionnaire. Fox indicated to the court during the colloquy that he understood
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189050 - 2017-09-21
with a signed plea questionnaire. Fox indicated to the court during the colloquy that he understood
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189050 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Postconviction, Azizi filed a pro se motion for a new trial in which he alleged that the trial court violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115773 - 2017-09-21
Postconviction, Azizi filed a pro se motion for a new trial in which he alleged that the trial court violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115773 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph V. Hotynski
to identify him. When Hotynski attempted to step to the rear of the vehicle at the officer's request, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9827 - 2005-03-31
to identify him. When Hotynski attempted to step to the rear of the vehicle at the officer's request, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9827 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frankie G.
waiving its jurisdiction under § 48.18, Stats.[2] He argues that a new waiver hearing is required because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9350 - 2005-03-31
waiving its jurisdiction under § 48.18, Stats.[2] He argues that a new waiver hearing is required because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9350 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
derivative evidence on the grounds that he had invoked his right to remain silent during questioning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163999 - 2017-09-21
derivative evidence on the grounds that he had invoked his right to remain silent during questioning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163999 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 9, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of Ap...
“[t]he width of the easement shall be equal to the widest point of the easement utilized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27743 - 2007-01-08
“[t]he width of the easement shall be equal to the widest point of the easement utilized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27743 - 2007-01-08
State v. James Durrah
resulted in a violation of the plea negotiation. First, he points to a statement the prosecutor made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2236 - 2005-03-31
resulted in a violation of the plea negotiation. First, he points to a statement the prosecutor made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2236 - 2005-03-31