Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27591 - 27600 of 63608 for records/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
concluded that the record was clear that T.G. Sr. “knew exactly what he was doing when he offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210906 - 2018-04-10

[PDF] Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
against the DOR’s assessment. Spickler argues that the record supports its estoppel claim. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21

David J. Peterson v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Company
or experience that he can reasonably be expected to obtain.[4] Accordingly, we review the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5117 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s frustration. The record reveals the parties were hostile toward each other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101288 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Monika S. Lackershire
they discussed or recited on the record at the time of the plea taking.” Second-degree sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20271 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of the certified return. After a hearing, the circuit court ordered prison officials to review their records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132602 - 2015-01-07

COURT OF APPEALS
explained that “Smith stipulated ... that he ... us[ed] alcohol and marijuana. The record also established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120143 - 2014-08-25

[PDF] Portage County Department of Human Services v. Rebecca E.
to have her appear by telephone from Taycheedah Prison, but for reasons not apparent on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3387 - 2017-09-19

State v. Thomas G. Bernier
a discretionary decision of the trial court, we examine the record to determine if it logically interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15934 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. On this record, we conclude that the circuit court appropriately exercised its discretion in refusing to hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34833 - 2008-12-10