Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2761 - 2770 of 30045 for de.
Search results 2761 - 2770 of 30045 for de.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
discipline complaint, to file a de novo disciplinary action, or to take no action at all. In this case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143347 - 2017-09-21
discipline complaint, to file a de novo disciplinary action, or to take no action at all. In this case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143347 - 2017-09-21
State v. Romel D.
of law, which [is reviewed] de novo.” State v. Young, 212 Wis.2d 417, 424, 569 N.W.2d 84, 88 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15775 - 2005-03-31
of law, which [is reviewed] de novo.” State v. Young, 212 Wis.2d 417, 424, 569 N.W.2d 84, 88 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15775 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Zong Lor
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6223 - 2017-09-19
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6223 - 2017-09-19
Wiederholt Excavating & Trench v. William Probst
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Brown v. Brown, 177 Wis.2d 512, 516, 503 N.W.2d 280, 281 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14154 - 2005-03-31
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Brown v. Brown, 177 Wis.2d 512, 516, 503 N.W.2d 280, 281 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14154 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court. Racine Cnty. v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75132 - 2012-01-22
de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court. Racine Cnty. v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75132 - 2012-01-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
commissioner denied the motion, Meyer-Spidell sought de novo review from the circuit court. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976392 - 2025-07-02
commissioner denied the motion, Meyer-Spidell sought de novo review from the circuit court. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976392 - 2025-07-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128, 137–138, 456 N.W.2d 830, 833 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92189 - 2014-09-15
de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128, 137–138, 456 N.W.2d 830, 833 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92189 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to the discretion of the circuit court. Berg v. De Greef, 37 Wis. 2d 226, 234, 155 N.W.2d 7 (1967). The rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117692 - 2014-07-22
to the discretion of the circuit court. Berg v. De Greef, 37 Wis. 2d 226, 234, 155 N.W.2d 7 (1967). The rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117692 - 2014-07-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is reviewed de novo. State v. Rash, 2003 WI App 32, ¶5, 260 Wis. 2d 369, 659 N.W.2d 189 (“whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209072 - 2018-03-01
is reviewed de novo. State v. Rash, 2003 WI App 32, ¶5, 260 Wis. 2d 369, 659 N.W.2d 189 (“whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209072 - 2018-03-01
[PDF]
State v. Paul Johnson
court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing de novo). However, we address Johnson’s claim on the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15287 - 2017-09-21
court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing de novo). However, we address Johnson’s claim on the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15287 - 2017-09-21