Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2761 - 2770 of 6659 for mix.

State v. Chris Lamar Crittendon
of the Strickland test involve mixed questions of law and fact. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 633-34. “‘An appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7228 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jimmy Lee Hensley
of Strickland are mixed questions of law and fact. Id. at 698. Findings of historic or evidentiary fact may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9812 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a ch. 51 order presents a mixed question of fact and law. The circuit court’s findings of fact shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229077 - 2018-12-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
¶14 “Whether counsel[] [was] ineffective [presents] a mixed question of fact and law.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760158 - 2024-02-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel claim is a mixed question of fact and law. State v. Erickson, 227 Wis. 2d 758, 768, 596 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191485 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
is a mixed standard of review. First, we determine whether the motion on its face alleges sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43579 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jeffrey P. Williamson
). ¶13 We review the denial of an ineffective assistance claim as a mixed question of fact and law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2732 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of serious harm.8 ¶13 Our review of a protective placement order presents a mixed question of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072857 - 2026-02-03

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
mixed questions of fact and law. See Sanchez, 201 Wis. 2d at 236, 548 N.W.2d at 76. Findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28105 - 2007-02-12

2010 WI APP 134
presents a mixed question of fact and law. See Jerrell C.J., 283 Wis. 2d 145, ¶16. When reviewing a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53555 - 2010-09-28