Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27601 - 27610 of 69399 for as he.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the motion was untimely and that Navarro had failed to make an offer of proof showing that he met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682853 - 2023-07-25

Sharon M. Hartman v. Lynn A. McDonough
with substantial help from Hartman and that Hartman paid McDonough $250 every month. He also argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13063 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Donna Shirley v. William J. Mallory
court order requiring him to pay interest and penalties for taxes due on family support he paid his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10073 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
at trial that he received a letter from Terrell asking Hodges to take the fall and claim responsibility
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177508 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was executed at his residence. He argues that the second warrant was based on illegally-obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213111 - 2018-05-22

[PDF] State v. Michael W. Slinker
, new charges were filed and he was sentenced to a twenty-year term to be served consecutively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3938 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 20AP1803-CRNM 2 our order. Green was advised of his right to file a response, but he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728260 - 2023-11-14

State v. Stanley Martin
was to be evaluated and thereby misled the jury as to the appropriate standard. He argues that because the jury did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12174 - 2005-03-31

State v. Scott L. Snow
to commence serving a sentence after revocation the following day. He was nineteen years old at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5261 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jack R. Martinsen
., and further, that there is insufficient evidence to conclude he met this requirement. Because this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11605 - 2005-03-31