Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27601 - 27610 of 30191 for de.
Search results 27601 - 27610 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
Batteries Plus, LLC v. Clinton Mohr
this question de novo, Winkelman v. Beloit Memorial Hospital, 168 Wis. 2d 12, 24, 483 N.W.2d 211 (1992
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17521 - 2017-09-21
this question de novo, Winkelman v. Beloit Memorial Hospital, 168 Wis. 2d 12, 24, 483 N.W.2d 211 (1992
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17521 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 81
)(a). Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29552 - 2014-09-15
)(a). Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29552 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Thomas E. Lengyel v. Sheboygan County
summary judgment presents a question of law which we review de novo, we still value a trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10287 - 2017-09-20
summary judgment presents a question of law which we review de novo, we still value a trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10287 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the lawyer’s performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107683 - 2017-09-21
the lawyer’s performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107683 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jimmie R.R.
, the question becomes one that we review de novo. See State v. Pepin, 110 Wis.2d 431, 439, 328 N.W.2d 898
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14684 - 2017-09-21
, the question becomes one that we review de novo. See State v. Pepin, 110 Wis.2d 431, 439, 328 N.W.2d 898
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14684 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kennn Kliese, v. Mariella Bates
of law, which we review de novo. Id. However, because the trial court’s legal determination is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3139 - 2017-09-19
of law, which we review de novo. Id. However, because the trial court’s legal determination is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3139 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144883 - 2017-09-21
review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144883 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment
conducting statutory certiorari judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court's ruling is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10761 - 2017-09-20
conducting statutory certiorari judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court's ruling is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10761 - 2017-09-20
Willie C. Simpson v. David H. Schwarz
is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Saffold v. Schwarz, 2001 WI App 56, ¶5, 241 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3461 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Saffold v. Schwarz, 2001 WI App 56, ¶5, 241 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3461 - 2005-03-31
Susan M. Tennyson v. School District of the Menomonie Area
of law” that this court reviews de novo. Stern, 185 Wis.2d at 236, 517 N.W.2d at 664. Further, “[a]n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15264 - 2005-03-31
of law” that this court reviews de novo. Stern, 185 Wis.2d at 236, 517 N.W.2d at 664. Further, “[a]n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15264 - 2005-03-31