Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27611 - 27620 of 29957 for de.

[PDF] State v. Mustafa M. Mohammad
we review de novo. …. Deficient performance means that counsel “made errors so serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14205 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Frontsheet
they are found to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142926 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
¶11 We review the validity of a statutory settlement offer de novo. Staehler v. Beuthin, 206 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27187 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Tony M. Smith
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16975 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
failed to follow statutory requirements in making an assessment is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397273 - 2021-07-28

[PDF] David Pagel v. Robert Gaffney
of law that appellate courts review de novo. Prosser v. Lueck, 225 Wis.2d 126, 136, 592 N.W.2d 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14759 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 23, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
complaint. ¶17 We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74301 - 2011-11-22

[PDF] Go America L.L.C. v. Kwik Trip, Inc.
of a summary judgment, we employ the same methodology as the circuit court, and our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24867 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Appleton Papers, Inc. v. The Home Indemnity Company
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed. Before Cane, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15644 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Aldene Kannenberg v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Kannenberg argues that we should give no weight to LIRC’s interpretation of the statute, employing a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12003 - 2017-09-21