Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27611 - 27620 of 30191 for de.
Search results 27611 - 27620 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. State v. Trawitzki, 2001 WI 77, ¶19, 244 Wis. 2d 523, 628 N.W.2d 801
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1080291 - 2026-02-19
of law that we review de novo. State v. Trawitzki, 2001 WI 77, ¶19, 244 Wis. 2d 523, 628 N.W.2d 801
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1080291 - 2026-02-19
State v. Dean Garfoot
(1985). Our review of the trial court's ruling is therefore de novo. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7956 - 2005-03-31
(1985). Our review of the trial court's ruling is therefore de novo. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7956 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
¶12 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106766 - 2014-01-13
¶12 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106766 - 2014-01-13
State v. Robert L. Von Haden, Jr.
which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification, however, presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7060 - 2005-03-31
which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification, however, presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7060 - 2005-03-31
State v. George C. Lohmeier
). This is a question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. See id. at 296. In addition, in cases involving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16941 - 2005-03-31
). This is a question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. See id. at 296. In addition, in cases involving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16941 - 2005-03-31
Judy Hartman v. Winnebago County
is a matter of law which we review de novo, benefitting from the analyses of the circuit court and the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17094 - 2005-03-31
is a matter of law which we review de novo, benefitting from the analyses of the circuit court and the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17094 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
there is sufficient evidence to support a bindover is a question of law subject to de novo review. See Williams, 104
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117785 - 2014-07-22
there is sufficient evidence to support a bindover is a question of law subject to de novo review. See Williams, 104
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117785 - 2014-07-22
[PDF]
John P. Trachte v. Andrew E. Barrer
the merits of the trial court's decision de novo, First Nat'l Bank v. Dickinson, 103 Wis.2d 428, 442, 308
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8301 - 2017-09-19
the merits of the trial court's decision de novo, First Nat'l Bank v. Dickinson, 103 Wis.2d 428, 442, 308
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8301 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 8
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wis., Inc., 2009 WI 74, ¶36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131917 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wis., Inc., 2009 WI 74, ¶36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131917 - 2017-09-21
Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. Robert Crawford
." Discipline is not intended to punish the judge. Further, we impose discipline on a de novo basis, although
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16363 - 2005-03-31
." Discipline is not intended to punish the judge. Further, we impose discipline on a de novo basis, although
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16363 - 2005-03-31