Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27611 - 27620 of 68236 for law.

State v. Bryant E. Carter
and the correct law. Id. ¶7 Here, the testimony was admitted as useful contextual background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4960 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant made the prima facie showing is a question of law that we review independently. Ernst, 283 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43959 - 2009-12-01

State v. Daniel D. Brown
that on those facts a reasonable person would have concluded he was in custody. This is a question of law we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2490 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frederick Rogers v. DOC
“that the Defendant as a state agency is immune from liability under Wisconsin law,” and in the order, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21703 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the police lacked a lawful basis No. 2011AP1537-CR 2 to stop his car and subject him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82117 - 2014-09-15

State v. Vonnie D. Darby
his sentence to the maximum permitted by law. Although we could conclude that Darby’s appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5418 - 2005-03-31

State v. Emmanuel Page
value and force that, as a matter of law, no reasonable trier of fact could have found guilt beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10477 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of Wisconsin’s Lemon Law, see WIS. STAT. § 218.0171 (2011-12), 1 and denying JBL’s motion for summary judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171370 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
judgment. Discussion ¶6 Whether summary judgment is appropriate is a question of law reviewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32808 - 2008-05-27

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2).[3] We review a grant of summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26896 - 2006-10-23