Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27621 - 27630 of 65586 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 27621 - 27630 of 65586 for divorce records/1000.
State v. Jerome M. Nelligan
. Nelligan claims this finding was clearly erroneous. Because the record supports the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12696 - 2005-03-31
. Nelligan claims this finding was clearly erroneous. Because the record supports the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12696 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mai Lee Vue
a response. Vue has not done so. This court has conducted the independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8798 - 2017-09-19
a response. Vue has not done so. This court has conducted the independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8798 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jason Frederick Work
was unduly harsh. Upon our independent review of the record, and upon our review of the no merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14554 - 2005-03-31
was unduly harsh. Upon our independent review of the record, and upon our review of the no merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14554 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001485 - 2025-08-27
2 review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001485 - 2025-08-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210047 - 2018-03-19
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210047 - 2018-03-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon my independent review of the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220259 - 2018-09-28
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon my independent review of the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220259 - 2018-09-28
[PDF]
State v. Gabriel J. Alwin
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10866 - 2017-09-20
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10866 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Gabriel J. Alwin
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10863 - 2017-09-20
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10863 - 2017-09-20
State v. Barbara J. Anderson
modification. The record reveals that when it imposed sentence on June 8, 2000, the trial court’s primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4335 - 2005-03-31
modification. The record reveals that when it imposed sentence on June 8, 2000, the trial court’s primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4335 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
against it. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132050 - 2014-12-22
against it. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132050 - 2014-12-22