Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27621 - 27630 of 63619 for records.
Search results 27621 - 27630 of 63619 for records.
State v. Nathan Speers
effort. The record of the suppression hearing does not bear out Speers’ contention. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17730 - 2005-05-02
effort. The record of the suppression hearing does not bear out Speers’ contention. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17730 - 2005-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
if the record demonstrates that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45266 - 2010-01-04
if the record demonstrates that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45266 - 2010-01-04
State v. Ary L. Jones, Sr.
that Jones did not want the army contacted and did not want to dwell on his military record. His attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4558 - 2005-03-31
that Jones did not want the army contacted and did not want to dwell on his military record. His attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4558 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. 2 We have independently reviewed the record, the no-merit report, and the response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180607 - 2017-09-21
a response. 2 We have independently reviewed the record, the no-merit report, and the response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180607 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jerry R. Dowdley, Jr. v. Circuit Court for Dane County
the certiorari petition was filed, the court ordered the return of the record. 1 After the return was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13520 - 2017-09-21
the certiorari petition was filed, the court ordered the return of the record. 1 After the return was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13520 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it “did not hear that” and replayed the recording with the court reporter simultaneously transcribing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140750 - 2017-09-21
it “did not hear that” and replayed the recording with the court reporter simultaneously transcribing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140750 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ty J. L.
satisfy itself that the record establishes to a reasonable probability that the alleged violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10468 - 2017-09-20
satisfy itself that the record establishes to a reasonable probability that the alleged violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10468 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but he has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175498 - 2017-09-21
, but he has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175498 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the State relies on in its brief, did not testify before the jury. The record confirms that Staples’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56964 - 2014-09-15
that the State relies on in its brief, did not testify before the jury. The record confirms that Staples’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56964 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 136
that this statement references facts not of record and the State concedes that there is no evidence to show that Adams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39591 - 2009-09-28
that this statement references facts not of record and the State concedes that there is no evidence to show that Adams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39591 - 2009-09-28