Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27621 - 27630 of 58506 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Peter Galowski
. Since then he has filed numerous postconviction motions, petitions and appeals in the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11020 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Robert C. Beese
of ten years in prison, structured as the trial court saw fit. The trial court accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2948 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Nathan Gillis
., and Deininger, J. PER CURIAM. Nathan Gillis, pro se, appeals the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13231 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Tague Roofing & Siding, Inc. v. Regent Liquor, Ltd.
a judgment on its claim against Regent Liquor, Ltd. The issue is whether the trial court properly set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15688 - 2017-09-21

Dennis Jones v. Jon E. Litscher
reversing a disciplinary decision. The trial court found that the department violated a procedural rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2572 - 2005-03-31

State v. West M. Jones
addresses whether Jones's no contest plea was knowingly and voluntarily made. Before the trial court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10857 - 2012-06-17

Lawrence D. Ledman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
. State Farm claims that the trial court erred in construing the provisions of the policy in the Ledmans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13567 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Patz Sales, Inc. v. Graetz Manufacturing, Inc.
argues that: (1) the trial court erred when it decided the “separate and distinct” questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7181 - 2017-09-20

Patz Sales, Inc. v. Graetz Manufacturing, Inc.
of Graetz’s business relationship with Patz Sales, Inc. Graetz argues that: (1) the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7181 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Villa Capri Shopping Center v. Malone & Hyde, Inc.
, we affirm the trial court. This action stems from Godfrey’s alleged breach of its commercial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9443 - 2017-09-19