Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27631 - 27640 of 37898 for d's.

COURT OF APPEALS
exceeded his or her powers. Id.; see also Wis. Stat. § 788.10(1)(d) (2011-12).[1] To meet this standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101464 - 2013-08-28

Lisa J. Poole v. David A. Poole
court characterized Ross’s testimony as insulting and stated that it “refuse[d] to write off Jehovah’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5612 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Bruce Black and Tracie Black, d/b/a Westside Auto Center LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34232 - 2008-10-07

State v. Charles R. Wincek
[d], transfer[red], conceal[ed], or retain[ed] possession of [] money … without the owner’s consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11804 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dominic E.W.
to an officer [or] employe … of such prison or institution, without his or her consent, is guilty of a Class D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12928 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
IV State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Ben D. Napier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34377 - 2008-10-22

[PDF] State v. Eddie J. Shumaker
. D. Sufficiency of the Evidence. Next, Shumaker claims the evidence was not sufficient to convict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8575 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
v. Weston’s Bar, Inc., 78 Wis. 2d 26, 42, 253 N.W.2d 493 (1977). Thus, “‘[d]amages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108789 - 2014-03-10

State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
) The defendant will promptly prosecute postconviction proceedings; and (d) The postconviction proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12127 - 2005-03-31

State v. Brook Grzelak
, Grzelak filed and argued a motion to dismiss all charges with prejudice under § 976.05(3)(d), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12501 - 2005-03-31