Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27641 - 27650 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] State v. Gabriel J. Alwin
discovering any helpful information. Alwin cites minor inconsistencies in the witnesses' statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10868 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Donshea L. Trotter
was convicted. Trotter relies on certain statements the court made when it sentenced him. He argues that one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7144 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Scott L. Zimmermann
that he or she can make a decisive statement about whether to submit to the test. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12156 - 2017-09-21

01-14 Amendment of SCR 70.245, 71.01, 71.04 regarding court reporters (Effective 07-01-02)
of a proceeding, such as: 1. Jury voir dire; 2. Opening statements; 3. Witness names in chronological order
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1130 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
needed to evaluate her statements in the context of whether she was, in fact, freely and voluntarily
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113337 - 2014-06-02

[PDF] State v. Clyde P.
be based on the criteria listed in §§ 48.18(5)(a) through (d), STATS., and a statement of the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9455 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Gabriel J. Alwin
discovering any helpful information. Alwin cites minor inconsistencies in the witnesses' statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10866 - 2017-09-20

CA Blank Order
was then placed under arrest for OWI. Calkins filed a motion to suppress his statements and all other evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136999 - 2015-03-05

State v. Joseph A. Landrum
contends this holding in Champion is contradicted by our statement that “[n]othing in this opinion affects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5655 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s statements and actions.” Muller v. State, 94 Wis. 2d 450, 473, 289 N.W.2d 570, 582 (1980). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55649 - 2010-10-18