Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27651 - 27660 of 30191 for de.
Search results 27651 - 27660 of 30191 for de.
Willie C. Simpson v. David H. Schwarz
is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Saffold v. Schwarz, 2001 WI App 56, ¶5, 241 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3461 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Saffold v. Schwarz, 2001 WI App 56, ¶5, 241 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3461 - 2005-03-31
Susan M. Tennyson v. School District of the Menomonie Area
of law” that this court reviews de novo. Stern, 185 Wis.2d at 236, 517 N.W.2d at 664. Further, “[a]n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15264 - 2005-03-31
of law” that this court reviews de novo. Stern, 185 Wis.2d at 236, 517 N.W.2d at 664. Further, “[a]n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15264 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to those facts de novo. Id. ¶19 The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317204 - 2020-12-22
to those facts de novo. Id. ¶19 The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317204 - 2020-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Jonathon D. Bell
the State’s conduct violated the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13996 - 2014-09-15
the State’s conduct violated the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13996 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241387 - 2019-05-30
reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241387 - 2019-05-30
[PDF]
State v. Bart C. Gruetzmacher
review de novo. State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145, 666 N.W.2d 1. See also State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16689 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145, 666 N.W.2d 1. See also State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16689 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Eric E. Rice v. Gerald Sielaff, M.D.
? For the reasons that follow, the answer to this question is no. ¶14 We review summary judgment decisions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24661 - 2017-09-21
? For the reasons that follow, the answer to this question is no. ¶14 We review summary judgment decisions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24661 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 21
is the Commission’s interpretation of WIS. STAT. § 70.111(27). We construe the statute de novo and without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777256 - 2024-05-08
is the Commission’s interpretation of WIS. STAT. § 70.111(27). We construe the statute de novo and without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777256 - 2024-05-08
[PDF]
Douglass H. Bartley v. Tommy G. Thompson
). Because the question presented is one of law, we review the trial court's decision de novo. Williams v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8307 - 2017-09-19
). Because the question presented is one of law, we review the trial court's decision de novo. Williams v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8307 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Burgraff v. Menard, Inc., 2016 WI 11, ¶20, 367 Wis. 2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171356 - 2017-09-21
review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Burgraff v. Menard, Inc., 2016 WI 11, ¶20, 367 Wis. 2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171356 - 2017-09-21