Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27651 - 27660 of 58928 for quit claim deed.
Search results 27651 - 27660 of 58928 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court elicited a guilty plea from Stoller when he intended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118589 - 2014-09-15
be arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court elicited a guilty plea from Stoller when he intended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118589 - 2014-09-15
State v. Antonio L. Ford
in reviewing this appeal. ¶5 Ford’s first claim is that his counsel should have argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2936 - 2005-03-31
in reviewing this appeal. ¶5 Ford’s first claim is that his counsel should have argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2936 - 2005-03-31
Wendi Muehls-Sussman v. Dennis Greenwood
employees on governmental immunity grounds. The Sussmans claim the respondents were not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3033 - 2005-03-31
employees on governmental immunity grounds. The Sussmans claim the respondents were not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3033 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
credit. Any claim that Kaufman is entitled to additional sentence credit would lack arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665412 - 2023-06-07
credit. Any claim that Kaufman is entitled to additional sentence credit would lack arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665412 - 2023-06-07
State v. Willie Burnside
agree with the State that this claim is waived in the absence of a timely objection, particularly where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13649 - 2005-03-31
agree with the State that this claim is waived in the absence of a timely objection, particularly where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13649 - 2005-03-31
97-06 ORDERED effective January 1, 2000, SCR 20:3.6(a),(c),(c)(1),(c)3),(c)(7) are amended; 20:3.6(d)and (e) are created, and the Comment to 20:3.6 is amended. FURTHER ORDERED proposed amendment of SCR 20:3.8, is denied.
to read: 20:3.6(c)(1) the general nature of the claim or defense claim, offense or defense involved
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=999 - 2005-03-31
to read: 20:3.6(c)(1) the general nature of the claim or defense claim, offense or defense involved
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=999 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶9 The statute at issue here is more akin to a notice of claim statute, as opposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141313 - 2015-05-04
. ¶9 The statute at issue here is more akin to a notice of claim statute, as opposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141313 - 2015-05-04
State v. Thomas W. Reimann
the repeater portion of his sentence, claiming that the State did not prove a prior conviction with the degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9603 - 2005-03-31
the repeater portion of his sentence, claiming that the State did not prove a prior conviction with the degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9603 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
of being a felon in possession of a firearm, see Wis. Stat. § 941.29(2)(a). Highshaw claims the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27271 - 2006-11-27
of being a felon in possession of a firearm, see Wis. Stat. § 941.29(2)(a). Highshaw claims the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27271 - 2006-11-27
COURT OF APPEALS
the Muenchows’ remaining claims because all required proof of negligence, and negligence requires proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74400 - 2011-11-29
the Muenchows’ remaining claims because all required proof of negligence, and negligence requires proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74400 - 2011-11-29