Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27651 - 27660 of 84058 for simple case search.
Search results 27651 - 27660 of 84058 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County, had not responded to his open records request pertaining to Milwaukee Co. Case no. 2006FA6891
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=553226 - 2022-08-09
County, had not responded to his open records request pertaining to Milwaukee Co. Case no. 2006FA6891
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=553226 - 2022-08-09
State v. Cynthia A. Provo
any questions about the plea you’re making or anything about this case at this time? MS. PROVO
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5600 - 2005-03-31
any questions about the plea you’re making or anything about this case at this time? MS. PROVO
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5600 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. § 809.21(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640653 - 2023-04-04
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. § 809.21(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640653 - 2023-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Tiggs is not entitled to credit in this case for time served on sentences from Racine and Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81587 - 2014-09-15
that Tiggs is not entitled to credit in this case for time served on sentences from Racine and Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81587 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
¶2 While unusual, the history of this case is not in dispute. Following the denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26834 - 2014-09-15
¶2 While unusual, the history of this case is not in dispute. Following the denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26834 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Sally S.
to hear the case, the court may enter an order waiving juvenile jurisdiction. Section 48.18(6), STATS.;1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9245 - 2017-09-19
to hear the case, the court may enter an order waiving juvenile jurisdiction. Section 48.18(6), STATS.;1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9245 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
denying her placement for a year or more.3 We conclude TPR warnings were not required in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27265 - 2014-09-15
denying her placement for a year or more.3 We conclude TPR warnings were not required in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27265 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
asserted that at a sentencing hearing in Chippewa County Circuit Court case No. 2004-CF19, Judge Roderick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212539 - 2018-05-08
asserted that at a sentencing hearing in Chippewa County Circuit Court case No. 2004-CF19, Judge Roderick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212539 - 2018-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
his case first. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Poehnelt constructed five ponds on his property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71743 - 2011-10-03
his case first. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Poehnelt constructed five ponds on his property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71743 - 2011-10-03
Town of Wautoma v. City of Wautoma
of annexation. In particular, § 66.021(12) provides that in cases where—as here—a petition for direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12026 - 2005-03-31
of annexation. In particular, § 66.021(12) provides that in cases where—as here—a petition for direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12026 - 2005-03-31