Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27661 - 27670 of 30059 for de.
Search results 27661 - 27670 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
standard for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241676 - 2019-06-05
standard for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241676 - 2019-06-05
State v. Agustin Velez
to require an evidentiary hearing is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. However
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17145 - 2005-03-31
to require an evidentiary hearing is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. However
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17145 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 30
196. “Under either procedural vehicle, our standard of review is de novo because we must interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=788828 - 2024-06-20
196. “Under either procedural vehicle, our standard of review is de novo because we must interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=788828 - 2024-06-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Miller, 392 Wis. 2d 49, ¶15. ¶22 Wisconsin courts employ both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624199 - 2023-02-17
is a question of law that we review de novo. Miller, 392 Wis. 2d 49, ¶15. ¶22 Wisconsin courts employ both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624199 - 2023-02-17
[PDF]
WI APP 59
, which we review de novo. State v. Steffes, 2013 WI 53, ¶15, 347 Wis. 2d 683, 832 N.W.2d 101. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145375 - 2017-09-21
, which we review de novo. State v. Steffes, 2013 WI 53, ¶15, 347 Wis. 2d 683, 832 N.W.2d 101. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a recklessness standard is a question of law,” which we review de novo. Kellar, 180 Wis. 2d at 183
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909500 - 2025-02-04
a recklessness standard is a question of law,” which we review de novo. Kellar, 180 Wis. 2d at 183
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909500 - 2025-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
reference additional facts as needed below. Discussion ¶12 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30884 - 2007-11-14
reference additional facts as needed below. Discussion ¶12 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30884 - 2007-11-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). The interpretation of the statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195380 - 2017-09-21
omitted). The interpretation of the statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195380 - 2017-09-21
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32-33. III. DISCUSSION ¶8 Article VII
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16744 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32-33. III. DISCUSSION ¶8 Article VII
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16744 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32-33. III. DISCUSSION ¶8 Article VII
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16760 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32-33. III. DISCUSSION ¶8 Article VII
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16760 - 2005-03-31