Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27661 - 27670 of 29823 for des.
Search results 27661 - 27670 of 29823 for des.
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32-33. III. DISCUSSION ¶8 Article VII
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16768 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32-33. III. DISCUSSION ¶8 Article VII
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16768 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the Partnership. ¶20 Our review of a circuit court’s summary judgment decision is de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541195 - 2022-07-06
with the Partnership. ¶20 Our review of a circuit court’s summary judgment decision is de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541195 - 2022-07-06
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17515 - 2005-03-31
to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17515 - 2005-03-31
State v. Evan Zimmerman
performance prejudiced the defendant present questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5901 - 2005-03-31
performance prejudiced the defendant present questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5901 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Anderson
from double jeopardy has been violated is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17083 - 2005-03-31
from double jeopardy has been violated is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17083 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Sprosty
which we review de novo. Szulczewski, 216 Wis. 2d at 499. ¶22 Our goal, in statutory
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17329 - 2017-09-21
which we review de novo. Szulczewski, 216 Wis. 2d at 499. ¶22 Our goal, in statutory
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17329 - 2017-09-21
Go America L.L.C. v. Kwik Trip, Inc.
judgment, we employ the same methodology as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24867 - 2006-05-30
judgment, we employ the same methodology as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24867 - 2006-05-30
Frontsheet
conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶5, 305
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142926 - 2015-06-08
conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶5, 305
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142926 - 2015-06-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, however, are reviewed de novo. Id. ¶38 Here, the circuit court correctly relied on our decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990025 - 2025-07-29
, however, are reviewed de novo. Id. ¶38 Here, the circuit court correctly relied on our decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990025 - 2025-07-29
State v. Shon D. Brown
interpretation subject to our de novo review. See State v. Gribble, 2001 WI App 227, ¶¶26-27 n.10, ¶31, 248 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5151 - 2005-03-31
interpretation subject to our de novo review. See State v. Gribble, 2001 WI App 227, ¶¶26-27 n.10, ¶31, 248 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5151 - 2005-03-31