Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27661 - 27670 of 29823 for des.
Search results 27661 - 27670 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
)(br). Whether a statute is constitutional presents a question of law subject to de novo review. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116170 - 2014-07-02
)(br). Whether a statute is constitutional presents a question of law subject to de novo review. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116170 - 2014-07-02
2010 WI APP 63
review de novo. See Walter v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 121 Wis. 2d 221, 231, 358 N.W.2d 816 (Ct. App. 1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47759 - 2010-05-25
review de novo. See Walter v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 121 Wis. 2d 221, 231, 358 N.W.2d 816 (Ct. App. 1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47759 - 2010-05-25
[PDF]
WI 42
, and we review the referee’s conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885190 - 2025-04-11
, and we review the referee’s conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885190 - 2025-04-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 1994). Accordingly, we review de novo the trial court’s threshold determination of whether given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27484 - 2014-09-15
. 1994). Accordingly, we review de novo the trial court’s threshold determination of whether given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27484 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mary Jo Howard Croake v. Paul Allen Croake
the change is substantial is a question of law which we review de novo. Dahlke v. Dahlke, 2002 WI App 282
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17775 - 2017-09-21
the change is substantial is a question of law which we review de novo. Dahlke v. Dahlke, 2002 WI App 282
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17775 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. C.
, is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Riddle, 192 Wis.2d 470, 475, 531 N.W.2d 408, 410
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12352 - 2017-09-21
, is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Riddle, 192 Wis.2d 470, 475, 531 N.W.2d 408, 410
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12352 - 2017-09-21
Dawn D. Hughes v. Mark A. Hughes
exercised its discretion because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13352 - 2005-03-31
exercised its discretion because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13352 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
under the same standard [that] we apply to a circuit court’s conclusions of law—de novo.” Tetra Tech
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589160 - 2022-11-09
under the same standard [that] we apply to a circuit court’s conclusions of law—de novo.” Tetra Tech
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589160 - 2022-11-09
David Pagel v. Robert Gaffney
of § 807.01 Stats., is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. Prosser v. Lueck, 225 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14726 - 2005-03-31
of § 807.01 Stats., is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. Prosser v. Lueck, 225 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14726 - 2005-03-31
State v. Xiong Yang
of law, which we review de novo. Tahtinen v. MSI Ins. Co., 122 Wis.2d 158, 166, 361 N.W.2d 673, 677
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8705 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we review de novo. Tahtinen v. MSI Ins. Co., 122 Wis.2d 158, 166, 361 N.W.2d 673, 677
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8705 - 2005-03-31