Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27661 - 27670 of 40024 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 27661 - 27670 of 40024 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
Reginald D. Burke v. Gary McCaughtry
, his direct admission, or contradictory statements indicative of guilt. See State v. Trimbell, 64
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14274 - 2014-09-15
, his direct admission, or contradictory statements indicative of guilt. See State v. Trimbell, 64
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14274 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
form, the statement of negotiated plea, and the plea hearing transcript—confirms that the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=814801 - 2024-06-24
form, the statement of negotiated plea, and the plea hearing transcript—confirms that the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=814801 - 2024-06-24
[PDF]
State v. Joseph A. Landrum
in Champion is contradicted by our statement that “[n]othing in this opinion affects a defendant’s right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5655 - 2017-09-19
in Champion is contradicted by our statement that “[n]othing in this opinion affects a defendant’s right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5655 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
A statement of emergency detention was filed on December 21, 1995. An order for commitment was entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181258 - 2017-09-21
A statement of emergency detention was filed on December 21, 1995. An order for commitment was entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181258 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Thompson
did, his statement would have been untrue. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12548 - 2017-09-21
did, his statement would have been untrue. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12548 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jevic Enterprises, Inc. v. Arlo E. Schultz
estoppel because he believed and relied on that incorrect statement. No. 01-1204-FT 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3927 - 2017-09-20
estoppel because he believed and relied on that incorrect statement. No. 01-1204-FT 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3927 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
the shotgun was in the SUV. However, in his brief Bell does not mention Gregory’s statement, as recounted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27733 - 2014-09-15
the shotgun was in the SUV. However, in his brief Bell does not mention Gregory’s statement, as recounted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27733 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” Id. (citation omitted). Taylor controls the outcome here. The circuit court’s statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597765 - 2022-12-06
.” Id. (citation omitted). Taylor controls the outcome here. The circuit court’s statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597765 - 2022-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
attorney and appeared pro se at his divorce trial. In his opening statement, Susan’s counsel summarized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88193 - 2012-10-15
attorney and appeared pro se at his divorce trial. In his opening statement, Susan’s counsel summarized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88193 - 2012-10-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court understood there was a split verdict, with acquittal on count one. Other than that one statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40934 - 2009-09-16
that the court understood there was a split verdict, with acquittal on count one. Other than that one statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40934 - 2009-09-16