Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27661 - 27670 of 68202 for law.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to the defendant is higher, but not substantially higher, than that authorized by law, the incorrectly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140873 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Joseph Scaro
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. Here, the relevant facts are not in dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15391 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Edgars Osis
lacking in probative value that it could be said as a matter of law that no reasonable trier of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11815 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Rick Pease, Jr.
809.50. There is absolutely no basis in law or fact for Pease’s argument. ¶9 Second, in our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18320 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] James E. Jahnke v. Dennis Brown
. As indicated, the circuit court found in Jahnke’s favor. ¶5 Interpretation of contracts is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2267 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
preclusion addresses the effect of a prior judgment on the ability to relitigate an identical issue of law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251476 - 2019-12-17

[PDF] Virginia Strelick v. Richard Strelick
and the law relied upon are stated and considered together for the purpose of achieving a reasoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2845 - 2017-09-19

State v. Randolph A. Clark
, that the officer confused him about his rights and responsibilities under the implied-consent law. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5197 - 2005-03-31

Oneida County v. Robert M. Pace
of fact and conclusions of law, the court itemized the defenses raised in the final amended answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9004 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a new factor is a question of law that this court decides independently. Id., ¶33. If the facts do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99875 - 2013-08-20