Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27661 - 27670 of 68207 for law.
Search results 27661 - 27670 of 68207 for law.
COURT OF APPEALS
to the facts is a question of law we decide without deference to the circuit court’s decision.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78071 - 2012-02-14
to the facts is a question of law we decide without deference to the circuit court’s decision.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78071 - 2012-02-14
State v. Martise D. Odems
as a mixed question of fact and law. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 698. We will not reverse the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13974 - 2005-03-31
as a mixed question of fact and law. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 698. We will not reverse the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13974 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of law. See Wis. Stat. § 973.20(13)(c)4. ¶4 On appeal, Hollingsworth first contends that Powell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50322 - 2010-05-25
of law. See Wis. Stat. § 973.20(13)(c)4. ¶4 On appeal, Hollingsworth first contends that Powell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50322 - 2010-05-25
CA Blank Order
of the U.S. Constitution and state law. We have carefully conducted an independent review of the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131756 - 2014-12-11
of the U.S. Constitution and state law. We have carefully conducted an independent review of the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131756 - 2014-12-11
State v. Jason D. VanStraten
Constitution is a question of law. State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1 (1992). Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6604 - 2005-03-31
Constitution is a question of law. State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1 (1992). Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6604 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., ¶13. A circuit court’s “decision to grant equitable relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86527 - 2012-08-28
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., ¶13. A circuit court’s “decision to grant equitable relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86527 - 2012-08-28
Lynn M. Sura v. Franklin J. Sura
the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15703 - 2005-03-31
the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15703 - 2005-03-31
John J. Surinak v. John Kaishian
party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we will affirm the trial court order granting summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12064 - 2005-03-31
party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we will affirm the trial court order granting summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12064 - 2005-03-31
County of Manitowoc v. Jean R. Klug
. ¶5 When additional law enforcement arrived, Horneck contacted the witness who had originally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7550 - 2005-03-31
. ¶5 When additional law enforcement arrived, Horneck contacted the witness who had originally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7550 - 2005-03-31
State v. James A. Smith
issues and arguments to those he raised in Smith II, however we do not consider Smith II as the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26318 - 2006-08-28
issues and arguments to those he raised in Smith II, however we do not consider Smith II as the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26318 - 2006-08-28