Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27661 - 27670 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 27661 - 27670 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of property seized. (1) Any person claiming the right to possession of property seized pursuant to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80626 - 2014-09-15
of property seized. (1) Any person claiming the right to possession of property seized pursuant to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80626 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Vincente Murillo, Jr.
arrest. Although Murillo claimed that he was out of the state on the day of the incident and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11982 - 2017-09-21
arrest. Although Murillo claimed that he was out of the state on the day of the incident and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11982 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to hear all claims to its true ownership.” See § 968.20(1). ¶4 At the hearing, Al-Mujaahid told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80626 - 2012-04-09
to hear all claims to its true ownership.” See § 968.20(1). ¶4 At the hearing, Al-Mujaahid told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80626 - 2012-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS
before trial. He does not claim that either his trial attorney or his postconviction attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79678 - 2012-03-19
before trial. He does not claim that either his trial attorney or his postconviction attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79678 - 2012-03-19
COURT OF APPEALS
county. Olson claims the State’s use of other-acts evidence violated his constitutional protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58813 - 2011-01-11
county. Olson claims the State’s use of other-acts evidence violated his constitutional protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58813 - 2011-01-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
”) and American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. (“AmFam Mutual”) in federal court, alleging claims similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015531 - 2025-09-25
”) and American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. (“AmFam Mutual”) in federal court, alleging claims similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015531 - 2025-09-25
[PDF]
WI APP 49
of summary judgment dismissing its subrogation claims against Thomas A. Mason Company, and Mason’s insurer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31848 - 2014-09-15
of summary judgment dismissing its subrogation claims against Thomas A. Mason Company, and Mason’s insurer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31848 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 483 U.S. 868 (1987). Homz does not make a Fourth Amendment claim in relation to the DNA evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31097 - 2014-09-15
, 483 U.S. 868 (1987). Homz does not make a Fourth Amendment claim in relation to the DNA evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31097 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Tommie S. Gray
is a question of law that we review without deference to the trial court. See id. Gray claims that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12632 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review without deference to the trial court. See id. Gray claims that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12632 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of extended supervision. ¶11 Satchell filed a motion for postconviction relief, claiming that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022512 - 2025-10-14
of extended supervision. ¶11 Satchell filed a motion for postconviction relief, claiming that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022512 - 2025-10-14