Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27671 - 27680 of 56622 for General Account Probate.
Search results 27671 - 27680 of 56622 for General Account Probate.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to five years of probation with nine months of conditional jail time. ¶9 Mellen filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030935 - 2025-11-05
to five years of probation with nine months of conditional jail time. ¶9 Mellen filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030935 - 2025-11-05
[PDF]
FA-614; Order Relating to Paternity/Legal Custody/Physical Placement/Visitation/Child Support/Health Care Expenses
, regardless of whether the violator is placed on probation under s.973.09, to provide reimbursement for any
/formdisplay/FA-614.pdf?formNumber=FA-614&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2022-07-14
, regardless of whether the violator is placed on probation under s.973.09, to provide reimbursement for any
/formdisplay/FA-614.pdf?formNumber=FA-614&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2022-07-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was on probation and did not want to contact law enforcement. However, after Xiong’s trial, Buhse made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982486 - 2025-07-15
was on probation and did not want to contact law enforcement. However, after Xiong’s trial, Buhse made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982486 - 2025-07-15
[PDF]
City of Oshkosh v. Steven J. Winkler
of Wisconsin—Oshkosh placed Steven J. Winkler on “disciplinary probation” after a Student Conduct Hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10639 - 2017-09-20
of Wisconsin—Oshkosh placed Steven J. Winkler on “disciplinary probation” after a Student Conduct Hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10639 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. Sentence was withheld on the remaining count and Wierzchowski was placed on probation for three and one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34840 - 2008-12-09
. Sentence was withheld on the remaining count and Wierzchowski was placed on probation for three and one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34840 - 2008-12-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
concluded, however, that probation would unduly depreciate the gravity of Dukes’s crimes. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728023 - 2023-11-14
concluded, however, that probation would unduly depreciate the gravity of Dukes’s crimes. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728023 - 2023-11-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
and Wierzchowski was placed on probation for three and one-half years. No. 2008AP65 11 ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34840 - 2014-09-15
and Wierzchowski was placed on probation for three and one-half years. No. 2008AP65 11 ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34840 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
signed a form titled “Admission to Violation of Probation, Conditional Discharge or Supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33857 - 2008-08-27
signed a form titled “Admission to Violation of Probation, Conditional Discharge or Supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33857 - 2008-08-27
State v. Charles G. Montgomery
successful on probation in the past, and opined that Montgomery’s decision to go outside with a gun, rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21122 - 2006-01-30
successful on probation in the past, and opined that Montgomery’s decision to go outside with a gun, rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21122 - 2006-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
considered relevant sentencing objectives and factors. The sentencing court rejected probation because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645206 - 2023-04-18
considered relevant sentencing objectives and factors. The sentencing court rejected probation because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645206 - 2023-04-18