Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27671 - 27680 of 29823 for des.
Search results 27671 - 27680 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
; whether counsel’s conduct constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=944807 - 2025-04-24
; whether counsel’s conduct constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=944807 - 2025-04-24
[PDF]
State v. Brian D. Robins
undercover officer posing online as a child is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Jensen
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16431 - 2017-09-21
undercover officer posing online as a child is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Jensen
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16431 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John C. Setagord
presents a question of law, which we decide de novo. See State v. Eichman, 155 Wis.2d 552, 560, 456 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8543 - 2017-09-19
presents a question of law, which we decide de novo. See State v. Eichman, 155 Wis.2d 552, 560, 456 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8543 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 153
assessment is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29086 - 2014-09-15
assessment is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29086 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James D. Miller
decide de novo. Fawcett, 145 Wis. 2d at 249. ¶28 We begin by rejecting the State’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4001 - 2017-09-20
decide de novo. Fawcett, 145 Wis. 2d at 249. ¶28 We begin by rejecting the State’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4001 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Shon D. Brown
a question of statutory interpretation subject to our de novo review. See State v. Gribble, 2001 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5151 - 2017-09-19
a question of statutory interpretation subject to our de novo review. See State v. Gribble, 2001 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5151 - 2017-09-19
Tina M. Busch v. Margaret O'Connor
that it constituted a de facto deportation. ¶16 Although in State ex rel. Halverson v. Young, 154 N.W.2d 699
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4976 - 2005-03-31
that it constituted a de facto deportation. ¶16 Although in State ex rel. Halverson v. Young, 154 N.W.2d 699
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4976 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert Jamont Wright
which we review de novo. Id. Van Rybroek’s Expert Testimony ¶31 Wright first argues that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6103 - 2017-09-19
which we review de novo. Id. Van Rybroek’s Expert Testimony ¶31 Wright first argues that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6103 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 30
judgment de novo using the same methodology as the circuit court. Talley, 381 Wis. 2d 393, ¶12. Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654464 - 2023-07-12
judgment de novo using the same methodology as the circuit court. Talley, 381 Wis. 2d 393, ¶12. Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654464 - 2023-07-12
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence A. Williams
was "seized" for Fourth Amendment purposes is reviewed de novo. Id. ¶18 Warrentless searches are per se
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16479 - 2017-09-21
was "seized" for Fourth Amendment purposes is reviewed de novo. Id. ¶18 Warrentless searches are per se
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16479 - 2017-09-21