Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27671 - 27680 of 69819 for hi.

State v. Paul R. Benzel
. CANE, P.J. Paul Benzel, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13347 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
terminating his parental rights to Tristian J. Marqurs’ appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136865 - 2017-09-21

County of Jefferson v. Dale W. Prout
intoxicated, first offense, after the trial court denied his motion to suppress. Prout argues the Jefferson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7601 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
counsel clarified on cross-examination that Anthony R. had no access to incendiary devices on his floor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101725 - 2013-09-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
because his sign does not meet the definition of an off-premises sign. He also argues the City’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143903 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Thomas J. Haydock
finding that his refusal to submit to a blood alcohol test was unreasonable. As a result, Haydock’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11664 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Gloria J. Unzen v. Overhead Door Company of Duluth
to retrieve the ladder from the roadway. Richard stopped his pick-up truck on the right side of the road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7190 - 2017-09-20

State v. Paul R. Benzel
. CANE, P.J. Paul Benzel, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13346 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, possession of drug paraphernalia. The charges arose from allegations that Baez gave his seventeen-year-old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34497 - 2008-11-04

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Randy C.
terminating his parental rights to his son, Cherokee W.D. Randy argues that the County did not present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4891 - 2005-03-31