Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27681 - 27690 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 27681 - 27690 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Legacy did not present affidavits or offer testimony to support its motions.2 ¶4 WPF filed two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86294 - 2014-09-15
. Legacy did not present affidavits or offer testimony to support its motions.2 ¶4 WPF filed two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86294 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in denying his motion to suppress that evidence. We conclude that there was no reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108029 - 2014-02-12
in denying his motion to suppress that evidence. We conclude that there was no reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108029 - 2014-02-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and eight years of extended supervision. Horrighs filed a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242538 - 2019-06-19
of initial confinement and eight years of extended supervision. Horrighs filed a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242538 - 2019-06-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his postconviction motion to be declared eligible for the Challenge Incarceration and Earned
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122143 - 2014-09-24
denying his postconviction motion to be declared eligible for the Challenge Incarceration and Earned
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122143 - 2014-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS
of an inadvertent mistake. Legacy did not present affidavits or offer testimony to support its motions.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86294 - 2012-08-20
of an inadvertent mistake. Legacy did not present affidavits or offer testimony to support its motions.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86294 - 2012-08-20
[PDF]
State v. Ashanti D.
appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He raises three issues for review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10355 - 2017-09-20
appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He raises three issues for review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10355 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order of the circuit court for Jefferson County denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416175 - 2021-08-26
and an order of the circuit court for Jefferson County denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416175 - 2021-08-26
[PDF]
State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
), and 939.32 (2001– 2002).1 She also appeals from an order denying her postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5453 - 2017-09-19
), and 939.32 (2001– 2002).1 She also appeals from an order denying her postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5453 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for sentence modification. Benka was advised of his right to file a response, but he has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248716 - 2019-10-16
motion for sentence modification. Benka was advised of his right to file a response, but he has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248716 - 2019-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Burton contends that the trial court: (1) erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94286 - 2013-03-19
his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Burton contends that the trial court: (1) erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94286 - 2013-03-19