Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27681 - 27690 of 58337 for speedy trial.
Search results 27681 - 27690 of 58337 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Maurice D. Harris
also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Harris contends his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5765 - 2017-09-19
also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Harris contends his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5765 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jason L. Jorgensen
to § 948.03(2)(b), STATS. The issue is whether Jorgenson is entitled to a new trial because the State made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11386 - 2017-09-19
to § 948.03(2)(b), STATS. The issue is whether Jorgenson is entitled to a new trial because the State made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11386 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth M. W.
. The issue is whether the trial court erred in applying a preponderance-of-the-evidence burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9044 - 2017-09-19
. The issue is whether the trial court erred in applying a preponderance-of-the-evidence burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9044 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Bruce A. Rumage v. Donald W. Gudmanson
, and (2) the alleged interference with his access to courts. The trial court granted the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12011 - 2017-09-21
, and (2) the alleged interference with his access to courts. The trial court granted the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12011 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dariell D. Cross
N.W.2d 309, 314 (Ct. App. 1987). The primary factors to be considered by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14404 - 2014-09-15
N.W.2d 309, 314 (Ct. App. 1987). The primary factors to be considered by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14404 - 2014-09-15
State v. David Marschke
a sentence reduction based on new factors. He argues that the trial court should have allowed him to call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2513 - 2005-03-31
a sentence reduction based on new factors. He argues that the trial court should have allowed him to call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2513 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas K. Uhde
that he did not enter a knowing and voluntary plea, for two reasons: (1) the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5918 - 2005-03-31
that he did not enter a knowing and voluntary plea, for two reasons: (1) the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5918 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kevin S.B.
trial attorney employed a reasonable trial strategy, we affirm the judgment and orders. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15388 - 2017-09-21
trial attorney employed a reasonable trial strategy, we affirm the judgment and orders. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15388 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
errors; and (3) other errors before or during trial. London was provided a copy of the report but has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282190 - 2020-08-27
errors; and (3) other errors before or during trial. London was provided a copy of the report but has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282190 - 2020-08-27
State v. Jerry McMahon
his rights to a jury trial, confrontation and protection against self-incrimination. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13061 - 2005-03-31
his rights to a jury trial, confrontation and protection against self-incrimination. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13061 - 2005-03-31