Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2771 - 2780 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 2771 - 2780 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
Alternative Dispute Resolution Report, Revised 9-5-2000
this process, the rules of evidence and procedure were followed and rulings on motions as well as the outcome
/publications/reports/docs/adrpilot.pdf - 2006-06-19
this process, the rules of evidence and procedure were followed and rulings on motions as well as the outcome
/publications/reports/docs/adrpilot.pdf - 2006-06-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in their custody. The trial court decided to wait to rule upon the motion until the guardianship trial had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90931 - 2014-09-15
in their custody. The trial court decided to wait to rule upon the motion until the guardianship trial had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90931 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in their custody. The trial court decided to wait to rule upon the motion until the guardianship trial had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90931 - 2012-12-26
in their custody. The trial court decided to wait to rule upon the motion until the guardianship trial had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90931 - 2012-12-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ motion to suppress his statements at the hospital, finding that Bavers was not in custody when he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254922 - 2020-02-20
’ motion to suppress his statements at the hospital, finding that Bavers was not in custody when he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254922 - 2020-02-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
does not meet the custodial prerequisite files a WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion, the circuit court lacks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127589 - 2017-09-21
does not meet the custodial prerequisite files a WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion, the circuit court lacks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127589 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, the motion must be brought by “a prisoner in custody under sentence of a court.” Wis. Stat. § 974.06(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127589 - 2014-11-10
, the motion must be brought by “a prisoner in custody under sentence of a court.” Wis. Stat. § 974.06(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127589 - 2014-11-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rights because Yang was not in custody when he was interrogated. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344153 - 2021-03-09
rights because Yang was not in custody when he was interrogated. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344153 - 2021-03-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, C.J. 1 Lazeric R. Maxey appeals from an order denying his motion for a 138-day credit against his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164802 - 2017-09-21
, C.J. 1 Lazeric R. Maxey appeals from an order denying his motion for a 138-day credit against his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164802 - 2017-09-21
State v. Lee Terrence Presley
to the court, reflecting that Presley had been in custody for 138 days from the date of his arrest until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24830 - 2006-05-30
to the court, reflecting that Presley had been in custody for 138 days from the date of his arrest until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24830 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
State v. Lee Terrence Presley
presided over the sentencings. The Honorable John Siefert presided over the postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24830 - 2017-09-21
presided over the sentencings. The Honorable John Siefert presided over the postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24830 - 2017-09-21