Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27701 - 27710 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] State v. Mustafa M. Mohammad
we review de novo. …. Deficient performance means that counsel “made errors so serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14205 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation, Inc. v. City of Madison
appeals. ANALYSIS ¶9 We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5309 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
surrounding the making of the statements, and review de novo the court’s application of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70920 - 2011-09-14

[PDF] State v. Ronald L. Ragan
are questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. With these standards in mind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10347 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
the legal conclusions of such a board de novo. Bar Admission of Vanderperren, 2003 WI 37, ¶20, 261 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16599 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
construction is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Leitner, 2002 WI 77, ¶16, 253 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175587 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
conclusions of law de novo. Id. We determine the appropriate level of discipline independent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231323 - 2018-12-28

Randy A. J. v. Norma I. J.
whether equitable estoppel lies de novo. Milas v. Labor Ass'n of Wisconsin, Inc., 214 Wis. 2d 1, 8, 571
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16596 - 2005-03-31

Joseph W. v. Catholic Diocese of Madison
We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11207 - 2005-03-31

2009 WI APP 143
that we review de novo. See State v. Hoover, 2003 WI App 117, ¶29, 265 Wis. 2d 607, 666 N.W.2d 74. So
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40095 - 2009-10-27