Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27701 - 27710 of 29821 for des.

[PDF] Glen Basken v. Richard Bechtel
to a fair trial presents a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Sinks, 168 Wis.2d 245, 257
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9635 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of treble damages on those claims. DISCUSSION ¶13 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172785 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Larry J. Sprosty
which we review de novo. Szulczewski, 216 Wis. 2d at 499. ¶22 Our goal, in statutory
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17329 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 31
,” a question of law is presented, which we review de novo. See id., ¶24. No. 2015AP2356 9 ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186914 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Sylvester Sigarroa
to be decided de novo. Roberts, 196 Wis. 2d at 452. This case is guided by the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6271 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI 14
unless they are found to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92284 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Willie C. Simpson v. David H. Schwarz
. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Saffold v. Schwarz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3461 - 2017-09-20

Aldene Kannenberg v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Kannenberg argues that we should give no weight to LIRC’s interpretation of the statute, employing a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12003 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
. § 895.529, which presents a question of law that we review de novo. Noffke ex rel. Swenson v. Bakke, 2009
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=368349 - 2021-07-07

State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14119 - 2005-03-31