Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27701 - 27710 of 82874 for simple case search.

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Notice of Appearance - Keckhaver (Respondents)
STATE OF WISCONSIN I N S U P R E M E C O U R T ____________ Case No. 2023AP1399-OA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0816keckhavernotice.pdf - 2023-10-16

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Notice of Appearance - Kilpatrick (Respondents)
STATE OF WISCONSIN I N S U P R E M E C O U R T ____________ Case No. 2023AP1399-OA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0816kilpatricknotice.pdf - 2023-10-16

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Notice of Appearance - Bellavia (Respondents)
STATE OF WISCONSIN I N S U P R E M E C O U R T ____________ Case No. 2023AP1399-OA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0816bellavianotice.pdf - 2023-10-16

[PDF] SC-5100V, Declaration of Service of SC-500
be supplemented with additional materials Page 1 of 2 Enter the name of the county in which this case
/formdisplay/SC-5100V.pdf?formNumber=SC-5100V&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-03-10

[PDF] State v. Daniel R. Ludwig
editorial about the case. We are satisfied that the trial court acted within its discretion and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5021 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
2 conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205698 - 2017-12-12

State v. Larry J.D. Spencer
assistance analysis applies to cases that are resolved by the defendant’s plea of guilty or no contest. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5912 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Curt Wenzel v. Kristy Peters
the complaint for insufficient evidence at the close of the Wenzels’ case. However, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4331 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
remanding this case back to DNR. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131596 - 2017-09-21

Curt Wenzel v. Kristy Peters
the complaint for insufficient evidence at the close of the Wenzels’ case. However, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4331 - 2005-03-31