Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27711 - 27720 of 63339 for Motion for joint custody.

State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
an order denying her postconviction motion for sentence modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5455 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Schlemm seeks resentencing on grounds that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93052 - 2013-02-25

[PDF] Kenneth Ness and Susan Ness v. Digital Dial Communications, Inc.
a renewed motion to vacate a default judgment against two garnishee defendants, U.S. Billing, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11772 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in denying his motion to suppress that evidence. We conclude that there was no reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108029 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Burton contends that the trial court: (1) erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94286 - 2013-03-19

State v. Scott Elvers
. Elvers then brought a postconviction motion seeking to withdraw his guilty plea on the grounds, inter
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18765 - 2005-06-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction No. 2011AP2273-CR 2 and from an order denying his postconviction motion. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93018 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Legacy did not present affidavits or offer testimony to support its motions.2 ΒΆ4 WPF filed two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86294 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motions. Haas claims that his due-process rights were violated when: (1) an out-of-court show-up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32212 - 2008-03-24

[PDF] NOTICE
and the assistant district attorney about withdrawing, counsel did not file a motion to withdraw because the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41635 - 2014-09-15