Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27711 - 27720 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 27711 - 27720 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Jesus Serrano
for post-conviction relief. The judgment was entered on Serrano's guilty pleas. He claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9718 - 2005-03-31
for post-conviction relief. The judgment was entered on Serrano's guilty pleas. He claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9718 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
imposed in the two Dane County cases. He now raises essentially the same sentence modification claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111436 - 2014-04-29
imposed in the two Dane County cases. He now raises essentially the same sentence modification claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111436 - 2014-04-29
State v. Paul R. Benzel
., is unconstitutional. He claims the trial court erred by concluding Hall did not affect his drug tax stamp conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13347 - 2005-03-31
., is unconstitutional. He claims the trial court erred by concluding Hall did not affect his drug tax stamp conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13347 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
that he does not claim any of the "defenses" set forth in SCR 22.22(3)(a)-(c). He agrees that he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40890 - 2009-09-14
that he does not claim any of the "defenses" set forth in SCR 22.22(3)(a)-(c). He agrees that he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40890 - 2009-09-14
[PDF]
Nicholas R. Ball v. Cooperative Educational Service Agency No. 6
it specifically in its answer. CESA’s answer did not specifically claim immunity under § 893.80(4), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11459 - 2017-09-19
it specifically in its answer. CESA’s answer did not specifically claim immunity under § 893.80(4), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11459 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that the scientific-evidence claim could have been raised in the 2010 motion. We agree: to the extent that Hampton’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82399 - 2012-05-14
that the scientific-evidence claim could have been raised in the 2010 motion. We agree: to the extent that Hampton’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82399 - 2012-05-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
address each of the three claims in turn. DISCUSSION ¶4 We utilize a two-part test for ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82360 - 2014-09-15
address each of the three claims in turn. DISCUSSION ¶4 We utilize a two-part test for ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82360 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Brief per CTO of 10-14-2021 (WILL)
an Omnibus Amended Petition collecting all of the claims made by all petitioners in this matter. Also
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefctowill.pdf - 2021-10-25
an Omnibus Amended Petition collecting all of the claims made by all petitioners in this matter. Also
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefctowill.pdf - 2021-10-25
[PDF]
Response Brief (Congressmen)
[ ]” for a Section 2 vote-dilution claim is the presence of a politically cohesive minority group that could form
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefcongressmen.pdf - 2021-11-01
[ ]” for a Section 2 vote-dilution claim is the presence of a politically cohesive minority group that could form
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefcongressmen.pdf - 2021-11-01
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Jill Gilbert
, and depositing funds she claimed as fees into her client trust account and subsequently withdrawing a portion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17073 - 2005-03-31
, and depositing funds she claimed as fees into her client trust account and subsequently withdrawing a portion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17073 - 2005-03-31