Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27711 - 27720 of 29966 for de.

State v. Lorenzo A. Mares
unless clearly erroneous. Id. However, we review de novo the application of constitutional principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5095 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
one reasonable inference, and therefore these are determinations for this court to make de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=556756 - 2022-08-18

[PDF] Patients Compensation Fund v. Lutheran Hospital-LaCrosse, Inc.
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Hartman v. Winnebago County, 216 Wis. 2d 418, 430
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17115 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Mustafa M. Mohammad
we review de novo. …. Deficient performance means that counsel “made errors so serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14205 - 2014-09-15

Jessica M.F. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co.
802.08(2), Stats.[8] Whether to grant summary judgment presents a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10148 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 42
, and we review the referee’s conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885190 - 2025-04-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient facts to get a hearing is de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50, 53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125544 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Brew City Redevelopment Group, LLC v. The Ferchill Group
City’s complaint. Accordingly, our review is de novo and is limited to whether Brew City’s complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21368 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
reference additional facts as needed below. Discussion ¶12 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30884 - 2007-11-14

[PDF] State v. Daniel G. Scheidell
to present a defense was violated is, however, a question of “constitutional fact” that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12489 - 2017-09-21