Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27711 - 27720 of 39868 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 27711 - 27720 of 39868 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶9 Ross also argues that the court erred when it accepted Tiffany’s statement about the value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34565 - 2008-11-11
. ¶9 Ross also argues that the court erred when it accepted Tiffany’s statement about the value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34565 - 2008-11-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the GAL’s statements amounted to her certification that waiver was in the best interests of Aaron given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82366 - 2014-09-15
, the GAL’s statements amounted to her certification that waiver was in the best interests of Aaron given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82366 - 2014-09-15
State v. Peter C. Ramuta
question him about his understanding of his constitutional rights, and failed to elicit any statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5603 - 2005-03-31
question him about his understanding of his constitutional rights, and failed to elicit any statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5603 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not agree that this statement supports that interpretation. By the Court.—Order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777463 - 2024-03-21
not agree that this statement supports that interpretation. By the Court.—Order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777463 - 2024-03-21
Darrell E. Beth v. Margaret R. Beth
, Darrell never filed a statement on transcript. The Racine County Child Support Agency, a respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12340 - 2005-03-31
, Darrell never filed a statement on transcript. The Racine County Child Support Agency, a respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12340 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joshua G. Storlie
considered the victim impact statements. Each of these factors was properly considered, see In re Felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11125 - 2005-04-15
considered the victim impact statements. Each of these factors was properly considered, see In re Felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11125 - 2005-04-15
County of Milwaukee v. Ellen T. Roy
for orders denying motions to suppress evidence or statements of a defendant. See § 971.31(10), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13750 - 2005-03-31
for orders denying motions to suppress evidence or statements of a defendant. See § 971.31(10), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13750 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
requested that the judge recuse himself based on statements the judge made at the restitution hearing, which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144916 - 2015-07-20
requested that the judge recuse himself based on statements the judge made at the restitution hearing, which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144916 - 2015-07-20
[PDF]
State v. Scott L. Zimmermann
that he or she can make a decisive statement about whether to submit to the test. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12156 - 2017-09-21
that he or she can make a decisive statement about whether to submit to the test. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12156 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
). No. 2012AP2467-CRNM 3 At the sentencing hearing, Hudson-Trapp’s attorney addressed a statement Hudson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92740 - 2014-09-15
). No. 2012AP2467-CRNM 3 At the sentencing hearing, Hudson-Trapp’s attorney addressed a statement Hudson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92740 - 2014-09-15