Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27711 - 27720 of 58507 for speedy trial.
Search results 27711 - 27720 of 58507 for speedy trial.
State v. Robert C. Beese
. The parties also agreed to jointly recommend a sentence of ten years in prison, structured as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2948 - 2005-03-31
. The parties also agreed to jointly recommend a sentence of ten years in prison, structured as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2948 - 2005-03-31
Tague Roofing & Siding, Inc. v. Regent Liquor, Ltd.
a judgment on its claim against Regent Liquor, Ltd. The issue is whether the trial court properly set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15688 - 2005-03-31
a judgment on its claim against Regent Liquor, Ltd. The issue is whether the trial court properly set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15688 - 2005-03-31
Dennis Jones v. Jon E. Litscher
reversing a disciplinary decision. The trial court found that the department violated a procedural rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2572 - 2005-03-31
reversing a disciplinary decision. The trial court found that the department violated a procedural rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2572 - 2005-03-31
State v. West M. Jones
addresses whether Jones's no contest plea was knowingly and voluntarily made. Before the trial court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10857 - 2012-06-17
addresses whether Jones's no contest plea was knowingly and voluntarily made. Before the trial court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10857 - 2012-06-17
State v. Robert R. Shaffer
an appropriate exercise of the trial court's discretion. We conclude that none of these issues provides a basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11137 - 2005-03-31
an appropriate exercise of the trial court's discretion. We conclude that none of these issues provides a basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11137 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Maurice D. Harris
also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Harris contends his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5766 - 2017-09-19
also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Harris contends his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5766 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Larry C. Olson v. Charles H. Thompson
then requested that the trial court find that Olson’s action was frivolous because he should have known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13310 - 2017-09-21
then requested that the trial court find that Olson’s action was frivolous because he should have known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13310 - 2017-09-21
State v. Shawn D. Knapp
for resentencing. The issue is whether the trial court violated Knapp's First Amendment rights by considering his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7753 - 2005-03-31
for resentencing. The issue is whether the trial court violated Knapp's First Amendment rights by considering his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7753 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn D. Knapp
for resentencing. The issue is whether the trial court violated Knapp's First Amendment rights by considering his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7751 - 2005-03-31
for resentencing. The issue is whether the trial court violated Knapp's First Amendment rights by considering his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7751 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn D. Knapp
for resentencing. The issue is whether the trial court violated Knapp's First Amendment rights by considering his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7752 - 2005-03-31
for resentencing. The issue is whether the trial court violated Knapp's First Amendment rights by considering his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7752 - 2005-03-31