Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27711 - 27720 of 38464 for t's.
Search results 27711 - 27720 of 38464 for t's.
[PDF]
State v. Alan J. Ernst
. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d at 207. When a defendant challenges the validity of a guilty plea, “[t]he state
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1246 - 2017-09-19
. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d at 207. When a defendant challenges the validity of a guilty plea, “[t]he state
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1246 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by hiding it from the Department on a weekly basis [,]” explaining that “[i]t is crucial to Domina’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108638 - 2017-09-21
by hiding it from the Department on a weekly basis [,]” explaining that “[i]t is crucial to Domina’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108638 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208765 - 2018-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208765 - 2018-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court for Rock County: RICHARD T. WERNER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Blanchard, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88087 - 2014-09-15
court for Rock County: RICHARD T. WERNER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Blanchard, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88087 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
). “[I]t is irrelevant that the legal theories, remedies sought, and evidence used may be different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102979 - 2013-10-14
). “[I]t is irrelevant that the legal theories, remedies sought, and evidence used may be different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102979 - 2013-10-14
State v. Dwayne E. Thompson
. Clearly, such potential manipulation of sentence credit is inconsistent with “[t]he clear intent of sec
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13235 - 2005-03-31
. Clearly, such potential manipulation of sentence credit is inconsistent with “[t]he clear intent of sec
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13235 - 2005-03-31
State v. Miguel Tanon
was erroneous and after reading the record, the court concluded: [T]here is no reasonable possibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9628 - 2005-03-31
was erroneous and after reading the record, the court concluded: [T]here is no reasonable possibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9628 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, 151 Wis. 2d 576, 587-88, 445 N.W.2d 676 (Ct. App. 1989) (“[t]he court should also consider the likely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34289 - 2008-10-14
, 151 Wis. 2d 576, 587-88, 445 N.W.2d 676 (Ct. App. 1989) (“[t]he court should also consider the likely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34289 - 2008-10-14
State v. Deshawn Rodgers
explained the limited purpose of the expert's testimony: [T]he expert has been working and proposes to offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9683 - 2005-03-31
explained the limited purpose of the expert's testimony: [T]he expert has been working and proposes to offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9683 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. (citation omitted). “[I]t is the exceptional case with ‘extreme facts’ which rises to the level
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785841 - 2024-04-09
. (citation omitted). “[I]t is the exceptional case with ‘extreme facts’ which rises to the level
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785841 - 2024-04-09