Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27731 - 27740 of 37890 for d's.
Search results 27731 - 27740 of 37890 for d's.
COURT OF APPEALS
] Appellants do not seek relief from the judgments under Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1)(a), (b), (d), or (g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-09
] Appellants do not seek relief from the judgments under Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1)(a), (b), (d), or (g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that, although he “stipulated to the facts constituting the charge” when he entered his plea, “he continue[d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020949 - 2025-10-09
that, although he “stipulated to the facts constituting the charge” when he entered his plea, “he continue[d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020949 - 2025-10-09
WI App 132 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2191-CR Complete Titl...
-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Warren D. Weinstein, assistant attorney general, and J.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103245 - 2013-11-19
-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Warren D. Weinstein, assistant attorney general, and J.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103245 - 2013-11-19
[PDF]
Lakisha Dahm v. City of Milwaukee
as Mr. Dahm’s beneficiary was “[r]evoke[d]” by their divorce. Accordingly, under WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20310 - 2017-09-21
as Mr. Dahm’s beneficiary was “[r]evoke[d]” by their divorce. Accordingly, under WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20310 - 2017-09-21
Daniel S. Stasiewicz v. Juan Pagan, Jr.
received a letter from Attorney John D. Surma indicating that he would be replacing Attorney Knapp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3882 - 2005-03-31
received a letter from Attorney John D. Surma indicating that he would be replacing Attorney Knapp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3882 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The no-merit report first discusses whether “the petitioner adhere[d] to all mandatory time limits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058668 - 2026-01-06
. The no-merit report first discusses whether “the petitioner adhere[d] to all mandatory time limits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058668 - 2026-01-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
)(d). The agreement further provided that “the [S]tate w[ould] recommend that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47707 - 2014-09-15
)(d). The agreement further provided that “the [S]tate w[ould] recommend that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47707 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E. Volk
, and erred in deciding he had not substantially complied with WIS. STAT. § 976.05(3)(a) and (d). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2509 - 2017-09-19
, and erred in deciding he had not substantially complied with WIS. STAT. § 976.05(3)(a) and (d). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2509 - 2017-09-19
State v. Roland A. Smart
of Catharine D. White, assistant district attorney of Shawano. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4996 - 2005-03-31
of Catharine D. White, assistant district attorney of Shawano. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4996 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frederick B. Harvey
with one count of aggravated battery, a class D felony. The complaint alleged that Harvey had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2297 - 2005-03-31
with one count of aggravated battery, a class D felony. The complaint alleged that Harvey had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2297 - 2005-03-31