Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27731 - 27740 of 30177 for de.
Search results 27731 - 27740 of 30177 for de.
[PDF]
Dawn D. Hughes v. Mark A. Hughes
that issue of law de novo. Kerkvliet, 166 Wis.2d at 939, 480 N.W.2d at 826
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13352 - 2017-09-21
that issue of law de novo. Kerkvliet, 166 Wis.2d at 939, 480 N.W.2d at 826
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13352 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
construction is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Leitner, 2002 WI 77, ¶16, 253 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175587 - 2017-09-21
construction is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Leitner, 2002 WI 77, ¶16, 253 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175587 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert Jamont Wright
which we review de novo. Id. Van Rybroek’s Expert Testimony ¶31 Wright first argues that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6103 - 2017-09-19
which we review de novo. Id. Van Rybroek’s Expert Testimony ¶31 Wright first argues that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6103 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 11
the verdict is de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Logterman v. Dawson, 190 Wis. 2d 90
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158224 - 2017-09-21
the verdict is de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Logterman v. Dawson, 190 Wis. 2d 90
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158224 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is sufficient to support the conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166030 - 2017-09-21
is sufficient to support the conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166030 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph F. Volk
The interpretation and application of a statute present questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Murdock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4692 - 2005-03-31
The interpretation and application of a statute present questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Murdock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4692 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 16
of counsel is a question of law,” which we review de novo. Thiel, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶21. The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254423 - 2020-04-27
of counsel is a question of law,” which we review de novo. Thiel, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶21. The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254423 - 2020-04-27
[PDF]
State v. William A. Schmidt
) to an undisputed set of facts. These are questions of law that we review de novo. See Swatek v. County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16931 - 2017-09-21
) to an undisputed set of facts. These are questions of law that we review de novo. See Swatek v. County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16931 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 71
unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84272 - 2014-09-15
unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84272 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
findings unless they are clearly erroneous. We review de novo whether those facts fulfill the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118853 - 2014-09-15
findings unless they are clearly erroneous. We review de novo whether those facts fulfill the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118853 - 2014-09-15