Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27731 - 27740 of 63536 for records.
Search results 27731 - 27740 of 63536 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Michael E. McGrath
, stating, “Therefore, on this record I will look at the sentencing matrix.”3 Acknowledging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21783 - 2017-09-21
, stating, “Therefore, on this record I will look at the sentencing matrix.”3 Acknowledging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21783 - 2017-09-21
State v. Rick Winter
were recorded on Schmidt's telephone answering machine, that violated the injunction. Winter first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10269 - 2005-03-31
were recorded on Schmidt's telephone answering machine, that violated the injunction. Winter first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10269 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of West Allis v. Wehr Steel Corporation
record established the necessity for entry. ¶5 Following extensive briefing, and based on the oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4897 - 2017-09-19
record established the necessity for entry. ¶5 Following extensive briefing, and based on the oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4897 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on five other counts in his plea. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578783 - 2022-10-19
on five other counts in his plea. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578783 - 2022-10-19
Amber L. English v. Virgil Woodworth
”; (8) Woodworth’s employment records state that his address was his mother’s; and (9) Woodworth’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15422 - 2005-03-31
”; (8) Woodworth’s employment records state that his address was his mother’s; and (9) Woodworth’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15422 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gregg R. Madden
) evidentiary support in the record. See Shanks, 152 Wis.2d at 290, 448 N.W.2d at 266-67. However, “even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14093 - 2014-09-15
) evidentiary support in the record. See Shanks, 152 Wis.2d at 290, 448 N.W.2d at 266-67. However, “even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14093 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the supplemental report, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355739 - 2021-04-13
, the supplemental report, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355739 - 2021-04-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
disobeyed the sign-in rule in violation of the ordinance on October 16, 2019. I agree that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278345 - 2020-08-13
disobeyed the sign-in rule in violation of the ordinance on October 16, 2019. I agree that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278345 - 2020-08-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785841 - 2024-04-09
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785841 - 2024-04-09
County of Dane v. Sherman C. Sporle
. The record belies Sporle’s claim, however. He did not testify at the suppression hearing, and the deputy’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4476 - 2005-03-31
. The record belies Sporle’s claim, however. He did not testify at the suppression hearing, and the deputy’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4476 - 2005-03-31