Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27731 - 27740 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 27731 - 27740 of 58340 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Leslie K. Dent
hearings was determined by Dent’s probation officer. He further claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15284 - 2017-09-21
hearings was determined by Dent’s probation officer. He further claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15284 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Carl J. Sweney v. Phyllis J. Sweney
denying his motion to reduce child support.1 The issue is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9819 - 2017-09-19
denying his motion to reduce child support.1 The issue is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9819 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Maurice D. Harris
also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Harris contends his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5764 - 2017-09-19
also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Harris contends his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5764 - 2017-09-19
Town of Grand Chute v. Mark Harry Gabriel
. However, Gabriel appealed his municipal conviction to the circuit court without requesting a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12629 - 2005-03-31
. However, Gabriel appealed his municipal conviction to the circuit court without requesting a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12629 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
., Higginbotham and Sherman, JJ. Nathaniel Cathey appeals a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134438 - 2015-02-02
., Higginbotham and Sherman, JJ. Nathaniel Cathey appeals a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134438 - 2015-02-02
State v. Dariell D. Cross
. 1987). The primary factors to be considered by the trial court in sentencing are the gravity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14404 - 2005-03-31
. 1987). The primary factors to be considered by the trial court in sentencing are the gravity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14404 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David Marschke
based on new factors. He argues that the trial court should have allowed him to call witnesses at his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2513 - 2017-09-19
based on new factors. He argues that the trial court should have allowed him to call witnesses at his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2513 - 2017-09-19
Carl J. Sweney v. Phyllis J. Sweney
appeals from an order denying his motion to reduce child support.[1] The issue is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9819 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying his motion to reduce child support.[1] The issue is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9819 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
supplement benefits (“caretaker benefits”). We conclude that the trial court correctly affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48448 - 2014-09-15
supplement benefits (“caretaker benefits”). We conclude that the trial court correctly affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48448 - 2014-09-15
State v. Shawn D. Knapp
for resentencing. The issue is whether the trial court violated Knapp's First Amendment rights by considering his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7754 - 2005-03-31
for resentencing. The issue is whether the trial court violated Knapp's First Amendment rights by considering his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7754 - 2005-03-31